Allen Keith B, Dowling Robert D, Schuch Douglas R, Pfeffer Thomas A, Marra Steven, Lefrak Edward A, Fudge Tommy L, Mostovych Mark, Szentpetery Szabolc, Saha Sibu P, Murphy Douglas, Dennis Hugh
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Vincent Hospital, Indiana Heart Institute, 10590 N. Meridian Street, Suite 105, Indianapolis, IN 46260, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug;78(2):458-65; discussion 458-65. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.04.049.
In a prospective, randomized trial involving 263 patients who would be incompletely revascularized by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone, CABG plus transmyocardial revascularization (CABG/TMR) provided an early mortality benefit with similar angina relief compared with CABG alone at 1 year. We evaluated the long-term outcome of patients randomized to CABG/TMR or CABG alone.
Thirteen centers that enrolled 83% (218/263) of the patients in the original trial participated in this longitudinal study. Between 1996 and 1998, these centers randomized 218 patients who would be incompletely revascularized by CABG alone because of diffusely diseased target vessels to either holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (holmium:YAG) CABG/TMR (n = 110) or CABG alone (n = 108). Baseline demographics and operative characteristics were similar between groups. Follow-up (mean 5.0 +/- 1.7 years) included survival and blinded angina class assessment.
At this 5-year follow-up both groups experienced significant angina improvement from baseline, however, the CABG/TMR group had a lower mean angina score (0.4 +/- 0.7 vs 0.7 +/- 1.1, p = 0.05), a significantly lower proportion of patients with severe angina (class III/IV: 0% [0/68] vs 10% [6/60], p = 0.009), and a trend towards greater number of angina-free patients (78% [53/68] vs 63% [38/60], p = 0.08), compared with CABG alone patients. Kaplan-Meier survival at 6 years was similar between CABG/TMR and CABG alone patients (76% vs 80%, p = 0.90).
Five-year follow-up of prospectively randomized patients who would be incompletely revascularized because of diffuse coronary artery disease indicates that the addition of TMR to conventional CABG provides superior angina relief compared to CABG alone.
在一项前瞻性随机试验中,纳入了263例仅行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)无法实现完全血运重建的患者,与单纯CABG相比,CABG联合心肌激光血运重建术(CABG/TMR)在1年时具有早期死亡率获益且心绞痛缓解情况相似。我们评估了随机分组接受CABG/TMR或单纯CABG治疗的患者的长期结局。
参与最初试验的13个中心纳入了83%(218/263)的患者参与这项纵向研究。在1996年至1998年期间,这些中心将218例因靶血管弥漫性病变仅行CABG无法实现完全血运重建的患者随机分为钬:钇铝石榴石(holmium:YAG)CABG/TMR组(n = 110)或单纯CABG组(n = 108)。两组的基线人口统计学和手术特征相似。随访(平均5.0±1.7年)包括生存率和盲法心绞痛分级评估。
在此次5年随访时,两组患者的心绞痛情况均较基线有显著改善,然而,与单纯CABG组患者相比,CABG/TMR组的平均心绞痛评分更低(0.4±0.7 vs 0.7±1.1,p = 0.05),重度心绞痛患者比例显著更低(III/IV级:0%[0/68] vs 10%[6/60],p = 0.009),且无心绞痛患者数量有增加趋势(78%[53/68] vs 63%[38/60],p = 0.08)。CABG/TMR组和单纯CABG组患者6年时的Kaplan-Meier生存率相似(76% vs 80%,p = 0.90)。
对因弥漫性冠状动脉疾病而无法实现完全血运重建的前瞻性随机分组患者进行5年随访表明,与单纯CABG相比,在传统CABG基础上加用TMR可提供更优的心绞痛缓解效果。