Allen Keith B, Dowling Robert D, Angell William W, Gangahar Deepak M, Fudge Tommy L, Richenbacher Wayne, Selinger Samuel L, Petracek Michael R, Murphy Douglas
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Indiana Heart Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Apr;77(4):1228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.01.008.
In prospective randomized trials at 1 year, transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) provided superior relief of angina, decreased rehospitalizations, and improved exercise times. We evaluated 5-year mortality and angina class in "no-option" patients with diffuse coronary artery disease randomized to TMR or continued medical management.
Two hundred twelve patients with refractory class IV angina who were not candidates for conventional therapy were randomized to receive holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet TMR (n = 100) or continued medical management (n = 112) at nine centers. Follow-up included all-cause mortality along with angina class assessment by blinded evaluators. Mean follow-up was 5.7 +/- 0.8 years.
Mean angina scores for TMR patients were 4.0 +/- 0.0 at baseline, 1.5 +/- 1.4 at 1 year, and 1.2 +/- 1.1 at a mean of 5 years (p < 0.001). After an average of 5 years, a significantly greater proportion of TMR than medical management patients experienced two or more class improvement in angina (88% versus 44%; p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier intention-to-treat survival at 5 years was 65% versus 52% (TMR versus medical management; p = 0.05). Cumulative hazard curves demonstrated a significantly reduced risk of late death for TMR patients; average annual mortality beyond 1 year was 8% versus 13% (TMR versus medical management; p = 0.03).
Five-year follow-up of prospectively randomized, no-option class IV angina patients demonstrated significantly increased Kaplan-Meier survival in patients randomized to TMR. The significant angina relief observed 12 months after sole therapy TMR was sustained long term and continued to be superior to that observed for patients maintained on continued medical management alone.
在为期1年的前瞻性随机试验中,经心肌血管重建术(TMR)能更有效地缓解心绞痛,减少再次住院率,并延长运动时间。我们评估了随机接受TMR或继续药物治疗的弥漫性冠状动脉疾病“无其他选择”患者的5年死亡率和心绞痛分级。
212例常规治疗无效的IV级顽固性心绞痛患者,在9个中心被随机分为接受钬:钇铝石榴石TMR治疗组(n = 100)或继续药物治疗组(n = 112)。随访内容包括全因死亡率以及由盲法评估者进行的心绞痛分级评估。平均随访时间为5.7±0.8年。
TMR患者的平均心绞痛评分在基线时为4.0±0.0,1年时为1.5±1.4,平均5年时为1.2±1.1(p < 0.001)。平均5年后,TMR患者中经历心绞痛分级改善两级或更多级的比例显著高于药物治疗患者(88%对44%;p < 0.001)。5年时的Kaplan-Meier意向性治疗生存率分别为65%和52%(TMR组对药物治疗组;p = 0.05)。累积风险曲线显示TMR患者晚期死亡风险显著降低;1年后的平均年死亡率分别为8%和13%(TMR组对药物治疗组;p = 0.03)。
对前瞻性随机分组的IV级无其他选择的心绞痛患者进行5年随访发现,随机接受TMR治疗的患者Kaplan-Meier生存率显著提高。TMR单一治疗12个月后观察到的显著心绞痛缓解长期持续,且继续优于仅接受继续药物治疗的患者。