Stephens Patrick R, Wiens John J
Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5245, USA.
Am Nat. 2004 Aug;164(2):244-54. doi: 10.1086/422342. Epub 2004 Jun 28.
Studies that have explored the origins of patterns of community structure from a phylogenetic perspective have generally found either convergence (similarity) in community structure between regions through adaptive evolution or lack of convergence (dissimilarity) due to phylogenetic conservatism in the divergent ecological characteristics of lineages inhabiting different regions. We used a phylogenetic approach to document a third pattern in the structure of emydid turtle communities. Emydid communities in southeastern North America tend to have a higher proportion of aquatic species than those in the northeast. This pattern reflects phylogenetic conservatism in the ecology and biogeography of two basal emydid clades, limiting convergence in community structure between these regions. However, differences in community structure between northeastern and southeastern North America have also been homogenized considerably by the dispersal of species with phylogenetically conserved ecological characteristics between regions. This pattern of ecologically conservative dispersal may be important in many continental and oceanic systems.
从系统发育角度探索群落结构模式起源的研究,通常发现不同区域间群落结构要么通过适应性进化趋同(相似),要么由于栖息在不同区域的谱系具有不同的生态特征,因系统发育保守性而缺乏趋同(不相似)。我们采用系统发育方法记录水龟科龟类群落结构的第三种模式。北美东南部的水龟科群落往往比东北部的群落拥有更高比例的水生物种。这种模式反映了两个基部水龟科分支在生态和生物地理学上的系统发育保守性,限制了这些区域间群落结构的趋同。然而,北美东北部和东南部之间群落结构的差异,也因具有系统发育保守生态特征的物种在区域间扩散而被大大同质化。这种生态保守性扩散模式在许多大陆和海洋系统中可能很重要。