Losos Jonathan B
Museum of Comparative Zoology and Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Ecol Lett. 2008 Oct;11(10):995-1003. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01229.x. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
Ecologists are increasingly adopting an evolutionary perspective, and in recent years, the idea that closely related species are ecologically similar has become widespread. In this regard, phylogenetic signal must be distinguished from phylogenetic niche conservatism. Phylogenetic niche conservatism results when closely related species are more ecologically similar that would be expected based on their phylogenetic relationships; its occurrence suggests that some process is constraining divergence among closely related species. In contrast, phylogenetic signal refers to the situation in which ecological similarity between species is related to phylogenetic relatedness; this is the expected outcome of Brownian motion divergence and thus is necessary, but not sufficient, evidence for the existence of phylogenetic niche conservatism. Although many workers consider phylogenetic niche conservatism to be common, a review of case studies indicates that ecological and phylogenetic similarities often are not related. Consequently, ecologists should not assume that phylogenetic niche conservatism exists, but rather should empirically examine the extent to which it occurs.
生态学家越来越多地采用进化视角,近年来,亲缘关系相近的物种在生态上相似这一观点已广泛传播。在这方面,系统发育信号必须与系统发育生态位保守性区分开来。当亲缘关系相近的物种在生态上比基于其系统发育关系所预期的更为相似时,就会出现系统发育生态位保守性;它的出现表明某些过程正在限制亲缘关系相近的物种之间的分化。相比之下,系统发育信号指的是物种之间的生态相似性与系统发育相关性相关的情况;这是布朗运动分化的预期结果,因此是系统发育生态位保守性存在的必要但不充分证据。尽管许多研究人员认为系统发育生态位保守性很常见,但对案例研究的综述表明,生态和系统发育相似性往往并无关联。因此,生态学家不应假定系统发育生态位保守性存在,而应通过实证研究来考察其发生的程度。