Fang Zixing, Kulldorff Martin, Gregorio David I
Department of Human Genetics, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7088, USA.
Neuro Oncol. 2004 Jul;6(3):179-87. doi: 10.1215/S1152851703000450.
The Atlas of Cancer Mortality in the United States, 1950-94 (Devesa et al.) published in 1999 by the National Institutes of Health suggests that there are elevated rates of brain and other nervous system cancer in the northwestern, north central, and southeastern parts of the country. Being descriptive in nature, the atlas does not evaluate whether observed patterns are simply due to random variation or if they are reflective of true geographical differences in disease risk or treatment practices. To formally test for geographical clustering of disease, we analyzed U.S. brain cancer mortality data from 1986 to 1995 with Tango's Excess Events test, the Cuzick-Edwards k-Nearest-Neighbors test, and the spatial scan statistic. All tests revealed statistically significant geographical clustering for both adult men and women. The spatial scan statistic indicated that the most likely cluster of high mortality was in parts of Arkansas, Mississippi, and Oklahoma (relative risk [RR] = 1.22, P < 0.0001) for women and in parts of Tennessee and Kentucky (RR = 1.15, P < 0.0001) for men. Several secondary clusters were detected, but there were no statistically significant clusters of a very localized nature and a high RR. For childhood brain cancer, there were no statistically significant geographical clusters. It is reassuring that no local brain cancer mortality "hot spots" with very high RRs were found. While the causes of the large geographical clusters with modest RRs are unclear, the geographical pattern of brain cancer mortality provides valuable information that can help in formulating etiological hypotheses and in targeting high-risk populations for further epidemiological and health services research.
美国国立卫生研究院于1999年出版的《1950 - 1994年美国癌症死亡率地图集》(德韦萨等人著)表明,美国西北部、中北部和东南部地区的脑癌及其他神经系统癌症发病率较高。该地图集本质上是描述性的,并未评估所观察到的模式仅仅是由于随机变异,还是反映了疾病风险或治疗方法的真实地理差异。为了正式检验疾病的地理聚集性,我们使用探戈的超额事件检验、库齐克 - 爱德华兹k近邻检验和空间扫描统计方法,分析了1986年至1995年美国脑癌死亡率数据。所有检验均显示,成年男性和女性的地理聚集性在统计学上具有显著意义。空间扫描统计表明,女性高死亡率最可能的聚集区在阿肯色州、密西西比州和俄克拉何马州的部分地区(相对风险[RR]=1.22,P<0.0001),男性高死亡率最可能的聚集区在田纳西州和肯塔基州的部分地区(RR = 1.15,P<0.0001)。还检测到了几个二级聚集区,但没有统计学上显著的非常局部化且相对风险高的聚集区。对于儿童脑癌,没有统计学上显著的地理聚集区。令人欣慰的是,未发现相对风险非常高的局部脑癌死亡率“热点”。虽然相对风险适中的大地理聚集区的成因尚不清楚,但脑癌死亡率的地理模式提供了有价值的信息,有助于形成病因假设,并针对高风险人群开展进一步的流行病学和卫生服务研究。