Suppr超能文献

树鼩(狨猴)和非树鼩(普通狨猴)咬肌纤维结构的比较分析。

Comparative analysis of masseter fiber architecture in tree-gouging (Callithrix jacchus) and nongouging (Saguinus oedipus) callitrichids.

作者信息

Taylor Andrea B, Vinyard Christopher J

机构信息

Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

J Morphol. 2004 Sep;261(3):276-85. doi: 10.1002/jmor.10249.

Abstract

Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) and cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) (Callitrichidae, Primates) share a broadly similar diet of fruits, insects, and tree exudates. Common marmosets, however, differ from tamarins by actively gouging trees with their anterior teeth to elicit tree exudate flow. During tree gouging, marmosets produce relatively large jaw gapes, but do not necessarily produce relatively large bite forces at the anterior teeth. We compared the fiber architecture of the masseter muscle in tree-gouging Callithrix jacchus (n = 10) to nongouging Saguinus oedipus (n = 8) to determine whether the marmoset masseter facilitates producing these large gapes during tree gouging. We predict that the marmoset masseter has relatively longer fibers and, hence, greater potential muscle excursion (i.e., a greater range of motion through increased muscle stretch). Conversely, because of the expected trade-off between excursion and force production in muscle architecture, we predict that the cotton-top tamarin masseter has more pinnate fibers and increased physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) as compared to common marmosets. Likewise, the S. oedipus masseter is predicted to have a greater proportion of tendon relative to muscle fiber as compared to the common marmoset masseter. Common marmosets have absolutely and relatively longer masseter fibers than cotton-top tamarins. Given that fiber length is directly proportional to muscle excursion and by extension contraction velocity, this result suggests that marmosets have masseters designed for relatively greater stretching and, hence, larger gapes. Conversely, the cotton-top tamarin masseter has a greater angle of pinnation (but not significantly so), larger PCSA, and higher proportion of tendon. The significantly larger PCSA in the tamarin masseter suggests that their masseter has relatively greater force production capabilities as compared to marmosets. Collectively, these results suggest that the fiber architecture of the common marmoset masseter is part of a suite of features of the masticatory apparatus that facilitates the production of relatively large gapes during tree gouging.

摘要

普通狨猴(绢毛猴)和棉顶狨猴(伶猴科,灵长目)的饮食大致相似,都以水果、昆虫和树液为食。然而,普通狨猴与狨猴的不同之处在于,它们会用前牙积极地在树上挖洞,以促使树液流出。在挖洞过程中,狨猴会张大嘴巴,但在前牙处不一定会产生相对较大的咬合力。我们比较了挖洞的绢毛猴(Callithrix jacchus,n = 10)和不挖洞的伶猴(Saguinus oedipus,n = 8)咬肌的纤维结构,以确定狨猴的咬肌是否有助于在挖洞时张大嘴巴。我们预测,狨猴的咬肌纤维相对较长,因此具有更大的潜在肌肉伸展幅度(即通过增加肌肉拉伸实现更大的运动范围)。相反,由于肌肉结构中伸展和力量产生之间预期的权衡,我们预测棉顶狨猴的咬肌比普通狨猴有更多的羽状纤维和更大的生理横截面积(PCSA)。同样,预计伶猴的咬肌相对于肌肉纤维的肌腱比例比普通狨猴的咬肌更大。普通狨猴的咬肌纤维在绝对长度和相对长度上都比棉顶狨猴的长。鉴于纤维长度与肌肉伸展幅度以及进而与收缩速度成正比,这一结果表明,狨猴的咬肌设计用于相对更大的伸展,因此能够张大嘴巴。相反,棉顶狨猴的咬肌有更大的羽状角(但不显著)、更大的PCSA和更高的肌腱比例。伶猴咬肌中显著更大的PCSA表明,与狨猴相比,它们的咬肌具有相对更强的力量产生能力。总体而言,这些结果表明,普通狨猴咬肌的纤维结构是咀嚼器官一系列特征的一部分,有助于在挖洞时产生相对较大的嘴巴张开幅度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验