Wixted John T, Gaitan Santino C
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0109, USA.
Learn Behav. 2004 May;32(2):173-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03196018.
Pigeons were trained using a symbolic delayed matching-to-sample procedure involving bright versus dim houselight samples. We hypothesized that when sample stimuli differ in salience, increasing the size of the retention interval will affect performance on trials initiated by the more salient sample only. In agreement with this prediction, accuracy following the dim sample did not decline as the retention interval increased, whereas accuracy following the bright sample declined to well below 50% correct. In a second experiment, the less salient (dim) sample from Experiment 1 was arranged as the more salient sample in a sample/no-sample procedure. Accuracy on dim sample trials then declined to well below 50% correct as the retention interval increased, whereas accuracy on no-sample trials remained constant. The results suggest that when sample stimuli differ in salience, pigeons may transform the nominal discrimination task into a detection task in which they respond on the basis of the presence or absence of the more salient sample.
鸽子通过一种符号延迟匹配样本程序进行训练,该程序涉及亮与暗的鸽舍灯光样本。我们假设,当样本刺激在显著性上存在差异时,延长保持间隔的时长只会影响由更显著的样本引发的试验的表现。与这一预测一致的是,随着保持间隔的增加,对暗样本做出反应后的准确率并未下降,而对亮样本做出反应后的准确率则下降到远低于50%的正确水平。在第二个实验中,将实验1中显著性较低(暗)的样本安排为样本/无样本程序中显著性较高的样本。随着保持间隔的增加,暗样本试验的准确率随后下降到远低于50%的正确水平,而无样本试验的准确率则保持不变。结果表明,当样本刺激在显著性上存在差异时,鸽子可能会将名义上的辨别任务转变为一种检测任务,即它们根据更显著的样本的存在或不存在做出反应。