McSweeney Frances K, Swindell Samantha, Murphy Eric S, Kowal Benjamin P
Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-4820, USA.
Learn Behav. 2004 May;32(2):190-201. doi: 10.3758/bf03196020.
Pigeons' keypecking was reinforced by food on baseline schedules of multiple variable interval (VI) x VI x and on contrast schedules of multiple VI x VI y. Deprivation of food was varied by maintaining subjects at 75%, 85%, and 95% (+/- 2%) of their free-feeding weights. Positive and negative behavioral contrast were observed. The size of the contrast was not systematically altered by changes in deprivation. Positive and negative contrast were both larger later in the session than they were earlier. Within-session decreases in responding were steeper for the baseline than for the contrast schedules for positive contrast. Within-session decreases were steeper for the contrast than for the baseline schedules for negative contrast. These results were predicted by the idea that different amounts of habituation to the reinforcer during the baseline and contrast schedules contribute to behavioral contrast. The results show that contrast occurs under conditions that reduce the effect of the following component. The results support the assumption that positive and negative contrast are produced by symmetrical theoretical variables.
在多个可变间隔(VI)×VI×的基线程序以及多个VI×VI y的对比程序中,鸽子的啄键行为通过食物得到强化。通过将实验对象维持在其自由进食体重的75%、85%和95%(±2%)来改变食物剥夺程度。观察到了正性和负性行为对比。剥夺程度的变化并未系统性地改变对比的大小。正性和负性对比在实验后期都比早期更大。对于正性对比,实验过程中基线程序的反应下降比对比程序更陡峭。对于负性对比,实验过程中对比程序的下降比基线程序更陡峭。这些结果与以下观点相符:在基线和对比程序中对强化物的不同程度的习惯化导致了行为对比。结果表明,对比发生在降低后续成分效果的条件下。结果支持了正性和负性对比由对称的理论变量产生的假设。