Gray Robert D, Haggart Kay, Lee Daniel K C, Cull Steven, Lipworth Brian J
Asthma & Allergy Research Group, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004 Jul;93(1):56-60. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61447-0.
Butterbur (Petasites hybridus) contains the active ingredient petasin, which exhibits antileukotriene and antihistamine activity. Previous studies of intermittent allergic rhinitis (IAR) have demonstrated a comparable response to butterbur compared with a histamine H1-receptor antagonist on the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey quality-of-life score. However, there has been no placebo-controlled study of the effects of butterbur use on objective and subjective outcomes in IAR.
To evaluate the effects of treatment with butterbur vs placebo on objective and subjective outcomes in IAR.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study was carried out during the grass pollen season in Tayside, Scotland. Thirty-five patients (14 men and 21 women) with IAR received butterbur, 50 mg twice daily, or placebo for 2 weeks. Domiciliary measurements were taken in the morning and evening for peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) (the primary outcome variable), nasal and eye symptoms, and rhinoconjunctivitis-specific quality-of-life score.
Butterbur treatment had no significant effect on PNIF, total nasal symptom score, eye symptom score, or quality of life compared with placebo use. Mean (SEM) morning and evening PNIF values were 107 (6) and 114 (6) L/min, respectively, for butterbur vs 105 (6) and 117 (6) L/min for placebo. Mean (SEM) morning and evening total nasal symptom scores (maximum total score, 12) were 3.4 (0.4) and 3.5 (0.4), respectively, for butterbur vs 3.7 (0.3) and 3.8 (0.4) for placebo.
There was no significant clinical efficacy of butterbur use vs placebo use on objective and subjective outcomes in IAR. Further studies are now indicated to investigate the use of butterbur in persistent allergic rhinitis.
蜂斗菜(Petasites hybridus)含有活性成分蜂斗菜素,具有抗白三烯和抗组胺活性。既往关于间歇性变应性鼻炎(IAR)的研究表明,与组胺H1受体拮抗剂相比,蜂斗菜在36项简明健康调查生活质量评分上有相似的反应。然而,尚无关于使用蜂斗菜对IAR客观和主观结局影响的安慰剂对照研究。
评估蜂斗菜与安慰剂治疗对IAR客观和主观结局的影响。
在苏格兰泰赛德的草花粉季节进行了一项双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究。35例IAR患者(14例男性和21例女性)接受蜂斗菜治疗,每日2次,每次50 mg,或安慰剂治疗2周。在早晨和晚上进行家庭测量,以获取鼻吸气峰流量(PNIF)(主要结局变量)、鼻和眼症状以及变应性鼻炎特异性生活质量评分。
与使用安慰剂相比,蜂斗菜治疗对PNIF、总鼻症状评分、眼症状评分或生活质量无显著影响。蜂斗菜组早晨和晚上的平均(SEM)PNIF值分别为107(6)和114(6)L/分钟,而安慰剂组为105(6)和117(6)L/分钟。蜂斗菜组早晨和晚上的平均(SEM)总鼻症状评分(最高总分12分)分别为3.4(0.4)和3.5(0.4),而安慰剂组为3.7(0.3)和3.8(0.4)。
在IAR中,使用蜂斗菜与使用安慰剂相比,在客观和主观结局方面没有显著的临床疗效。现在需要进一步研究来探讨蜂斗菜在持续性变应性鼻炎中的应用。