Suppr超能文献

左西替利嗪作为氟替卡松附加疗法治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的效果。

Effects of levocetirizine as add-on therapy to fluticasone in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

作者信息

Barnes M L, Ward J H, Fardon T C, Lipworth B J

机构信息

Asthma & Allergy Research Group, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 2006 May;36(5):676-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02478.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Addition of H(1) antagonists to intranasal corticosteroid treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) is common in clinical practice and recommended by guidelines, despite some evidence that the additive benefits are negligible.

OBJECTIVE

To assess additional benefits of 5 mg levocetirizine dihydrochloride in seasonal AR patients using 200 mcg fluticasone propionate nasal spray once daily.

METHODS

In a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study of 27 patients, following 2 weeks without treatment, subjects used fluticasone with levocetirizine or identical placebo for 2 weeks each. Assessments were the Juniper mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (mini-RQLQ), domiciliary peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), total nasal symptoms (TNS) scores and nasal nitric oxide concentrations. Effects were interpreted and tested against minimal clinically important differences.

RESULTS

Add-on effects for levocetirizine vs. placebo excluded any clinically significant benefits: mean effects (one sided 95% confidence intervals) were mini-RQLQ -0.11 (-0.34), PNIF +0.57 (+5.23), and TNS -0.11 (-0.60). Numbers needed to treat (95% confidence intervals) by outcome were mini-RQLQ 14 (5 to 49), PNIF 4 (3-7), and TNS 3 (2-6). No significant within or between treatment effects were seen for nasal nitric oxide.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to current practice, the present results demonstrate that for the majority of patients, antihistamine add-on to effective nasal steroid treatment is inappropriate. Further work is required to confirm that this is also true in the most severe cases, and the available evidence needs to be put into guidelines and implemented.

摘要

背景

在变应性鼻炎(AR)的鼻内皮质类固醇治疗中添加H(1)拮抗剂在临床实践中很常见,并且也是指南所推荐的,尽管有证据表明这种相加获益微不足道。

目的

评估在季节性AR患者中,每日一次使用200 mcg丙酸氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂时,添加5 mg盐酸左西替利嗪的额外获益。

方法

在一项针对27例患者的双盲安慰剂对照交叉研究中,在未经治疗的2周后,受试者分别使用含左西替利嗪的氟替卡松或相同的安慰剂,各为期2周。评估指标包括朱尼珀小型鼻结膜炎生活质量问卷(mini-RQLQ)、家庭鼻吸气峰流量(PNIF)、总鼻症状(TNS)评分以及鼻一氧化氮浓度。针对最小临床重要差异对效应进行解释和检验。

结果

左西替利嗪与安慰剂相比的附加效应未显示出任何具有临床意义的获益:平均效应(单侧95%置信区间)为mini-RQLQ -0.11(-0.34)、PNIF +0.57(+5.23)以及TNS -0.11(-0.60)。按结局计算的需治疗人数(95%置信区间)分别为mini-RQLQ 14(5至49)、PNIF 4(3至7)以及TNS 3(2至6)。对于鼻一氧化氮,未观察到治疗内或治疗间的显著效应。

结论

与当前实践相反,目前的结果表明,对于大多数患者而言,在有效的鼻用类固醇治疗基础上加用抗组胺药并不合适。需要进一步开展工作以确认在最严重的病例中情况是否也是如此,并且需要将现有证据纳入指南并加以实施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验