Puche-Navarro Rebeca
Centro de Investigaciones en Psicología, Cognición y Cultura, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Scand J Psychol. 2004 Sep;45(4):343-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00414.x.
The purpose of this study was to examine the development of representational activity through the comprehension of graphic jokes in 2, 3 and 4-year-old children. In experiment 1 we worked with three kinds of jokes, specifically mentalistic jokes, jokes based on substitution and complex jokes. We found differentiated performances on each kind of joke, as had been expected based on the semiological analysis of the jokes prior to the experiment. The earliest comprehension, at 3 years old, occurred with mentalistic jokes where more than 70% of the total sample was successful. The substitution jokes reached 47% in the three-year-old subjects, and the latest kind of joke to be understood by this group were the complex jokes, with only 31% comprehension. In experiment 2 we wanted to specify the cognitive functioning that was taking place in the comprehension of mentalistic jokes. We found similar successful performances in two mentalistic jokes with both the 3 and 4 year-olds in the study. Children's performances were analyzed from the point of view of processes of redescription which were involved in the understanding of the jokes. We conclude that humor tasks are appropriate instruments to examine development of children's representational abilities.
本研究的目的是通过理解2岁、3岁和4岁儿童的图形笑话来考察表征活动的发展。在实验1中,我们使用了三种笑话,具体来说是心理主义笑话、基于替代的笑话和复杂笑话。正如在实验前对笑话进行符号学分析所预期的那样,我们发现每种笑话都有不同的表现。最早理解的是心理主义笑话,3岁时就有超过70%的总样本成功理解。替代笑话在3岁受试者中达到47%,而该组最后理解的笑话类型是复杂笑话,只有31%的理解率。在实验2中,我们想明确在理解心理主义笑话时发生的认知功能。我们发现,研究中的3岁和4岁儿童在两个心理主义笑话上都有相似的成功表现。从参与笑话理解的重新描述过程的角度对儿童的表现进行了分析。我们得出结论,幽默任务是考察儿童表征能力发展的合适工具。