Suppr超能文献

腹部和盆腔Z轴自动管电流调制技术与固定管电流CT扫描的比较。

Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis.

作者信息

Kalra Mannudeep K, Maher Michael M, Toth Thomas L, Kamath Ravi S, Halpern Elkan F, Saini Sanjay

机构信息

Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, White 270-E, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Radiology. 2004 Aug;232(2):347-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2322031304.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and radiation exposure associated with 16-section multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) examinations of abdomen and pelvis performed with z-axis modulation technique of automatic tube current modulation and with manual selection of fixed tube current.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-two consecutive subjects (mean age, 60 years; age range, 19-84 years; male-to-female ratio, 35:27) underwent follow-up CT of abdomen and pelvis with use of a 16-section multi-detector row scanner and z-axis modulation technique (10.5-12.0-HU noise index, 10-380 mA). Scanning parameters included 140 kVp, 0.5-1.0-second gantry rotation time, 0.938:1 beam pitch, and 5-mm reconstructed section thickness. For each subject, images obtained with z-axis modulation were compared with previous images obtained with fixed tube current (200-300 mA) and with other parameters identical. Images were compared for noise and diagnostic acceptability by two subspecialty radiologists using a five-point scale (1, unacceptable; 3, acceptable; 5, excellent) at five levels: upper liver at diaphragm, porta hepatis, right kidney hilum, iliac crest, and upper margin of acetabulum. Tube current and gantry rotation time used for acquisitions at these levels were recorded. Data were analyzed with parametric and nonparametric statistical tests.

RESULTS

Although no significant differences were found (P =.34), images acquired with z-axis modulation at the levels of the upper liver (diaphragm) and acetabulum had a higher noise and lower diagnostic quality, compared with images acquired with fixed tube current. Compared with fixed tube current, z-axis modulation resulted in tube current-time product reduction in 54 (87%) of 62 examinations (mean reduction, 71.2 mAs) and increase in eight (13%) (mean increase, 17.0 mAs).

CONCLUSION

Compared with manually selected fixed tube current, z-axis automatic tube current modulation resulted in reduced tube current-time product and similar image noise and diagnostic acceptability at CT of abdomen and pelvis.

摘要

目的

比较采用自动管电流调制的z轴调制技术与手动选择固定管电流进行腹部和盆腔16层多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)检查时的图像质量、诊断可接受性及辐射剂量。

材料与方法

62例连续受试者(平均年龄60岁;年龄范围19 - 84岁;男女比例35:27)使用16层多排螺旋扫描仪及z轴调制技术(噪声指数10.5 - 12.0 HU,10 - 380 mA)接受腹部和盆腔的随访CT检查。扫描参数包括140 kVp、0.5 - 1.0秒的机架旋转时间、0.938:1的螺距及5 mm的重建层厚。对每例受试者,将采用z轴调制获得的图像与之前采用固定管电流(200 - 300 mA)且其他参数相同情况下获得的图像进行比较。由两名放射科亚专业医生使用五点量表(1,不可接受;3,可接受;5,优秀)在五个层面(膈肌水平的肝上部、肝门、右肾门、髂嵴及髋臼上缘)对图像的噪声和诊断可接受性进行比较。记录在这些层面采集图像时使用的管电流和机架旋转时间。采用参数和非参数统计检验对数据进行分析。

结果

尽管未发现显著差异(P = 0.34),但与采用固定管电流获得的图像相比,在肝上部(膈肌)和髋臼层面采用z轴调制获得的图像噪声更高,诊断质量更低。与固定管电流相比,z轴调制使62例检查中的54例(87%)管电流 - 时间乘积降低(平均降低71.2 mAs),8例(13%)增加(平均增加17.0 mAs)。

结论

与手动选择的固定管电流相比,z轴自动管电流调制在腹部和盆腔CT检查中可降低管电流 - 时间乘积,且图像噪声和诊断可接受性相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验