Lepretre Pierre-Marie, Koralsztein Jean-Pierre, Billat Veronique L
LIGE, Department of Sciences and Technology in Sports and Physical Activities, University of Evry Val d'Essonne, Evry, France.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Aug;36(8):1357-63. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000135977.12456.8f.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) is attained with the same central and peripheral factors according to the exercise intensity.
Nine well-trained males performed an incremental exercise test on a cycle ergometer to determine the maximal power associated with VO2max (pVO2max) and maximal cardiac output (Qmax). Two days later, they performed two continuous cycling exercises at 100% (tlim100 = 5 min 12 s +/- 2 min 25 s) and at an intermediate work rate between the lactate threshold and pVO2max (tlimDelta50 +/- 12 min 6 s +/- 3 min 5 s). Heart rate and stroke volume (SV) were measured (by impedance) continuously during all tests. Cardiac output (Q) and arterial-venous O2 difference (a-vO2 diff) were calculated using standard equations.
Repeated measures ANOVA indicated that: 1) maximal heart rate, VE, blood lactate, and VO2 (VO2max) were not different between the three exercises but Q was lower in tlimDelta50 than in the incremental test (24.4 +/- 3.6 L x min(-1) vs 28.4 +/- 4.1 L x min(-1); P < 0.05) due to a lower SV (143 +/- 27 mL x beat(-1) vs 179 +/- 34 mL x beat(-1); P < 0.05), and 2) maximal values of a-vO2 diff were not significantly different between all the exercise protocols but reduced later in tlimDelta50 compared with tlim100 (6 min 58 s +/- 4 min 29 s vs 3 min 6 s +/- 1 min 3 s, P = 0.05). This reduction in a-vO2 diff was correlated with the arterial oxygen desaturation (SaO2 = -15.3 +/- 3.9%) in tlimDelta50 (r = -0.74, P = 0.05).
VO2max was not attained with the same central and peripheral factors in exhaustive exercises, and tlimDelta50 did not elicit the maximal Q. This might be taken into account if the training aim is to enhance the central factors of VO2max using exercise intensities eliciting VO2max but not necessarily Qmax.
本研究旨在确定根据运动强度,最大摄氧量(VO2max)是否由相同的中枢和外周因素所达成。
九名训练有素的男性在自行车测力计上进行递增运动测试,以确定与VO2max相关的最大功率(pVO2max)和最大心输出量(Qmax)。两天后,他们以100%(tlim100 = 5分12秒±2分25秒)以及在乳酸阈值和pVO2max之间的中等工作强度下进行了两次持续的自行车运动(tlimDelta50 ± 12分6秒±3分5秒)。在所有测试过程中持续测量心率和每搏输出量(SV)(通过阻抗法)。使用标准公式计算心输出量(Q)和动静脉氧分压差(a-vO2 diff)。
重复测量方差分析表明:1)三种运动之间的最大心率、VE、血乳酸和VO2(VO2max)无差异,但tlimDelta50中的Q低于递增测试中的Q(24.4 ± 3.6 L·min⁻¹ 对 28.4 ± 4.1 L·min⁻¹;P < 0.05),原因是SV较低(143 ± 27 mL·beat⁻¹ 对 179 ± 34 mL·beat⁻¹;P < 0.05);2)所有运动方案之间a-vO2 diff的最大值无显著差异,但与tlim100相比,tlimDelta50中a-vO2 diff在后期降低(6分58秒±4分29秒 对 3分6秒±1分3秒,P = 0.05)。tlimDelta50中a-vO2 diff的这种降低与动脉血氧饱和度降低(SaO2 = -15.3 ± 3.9%)相关(r = -0.74,P = 0.05)。
在力竭运动中,VO2max并非由相同的中枢和外周因素所达成,且tlimDelta50并未引发最大Q值。如果训练目标是使用引发VO2max但不一定是Qmax的运动强度来增强VO2max的中枢因素,那么这一点可能需要考虑。