Suppr超能文献

持续气管内吹入氧气可提高机械胸外按压-主动减压心肺复苏的效果。

Continuous intratracheal insufflation of oxygen improves the efficacy of mechanical chest compression-active decompression CPR.

作者信息

Steen Stig, Liao Qiuming, Pierre Leif, Paskevicius Audrius, Sjöberg Trygve

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart-Lung Division, University Hospital of Lund, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2004 Aug;62(2):219-27. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.02.017.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of intratracheal continuous insufflation of oxygen (CIO) with intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) regarding gas exchange and haemodynamics during mechanical chest compression-active decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (mCPR) provided by the LUCAS device. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced electrically and ventilation was discontinued in 16 pigs, mean body weight 23 kg (range 22-27 kg). They were randomized into two groups (CIO versus IPPV). After 8 min of VF, mCPR was started and run for 30 min in normothermia, after which defibrillation was attempted during on-going mCPR. Return of spontaneous circulation was obtained in eight of eight CIO pigs and in four of eight IPPV pigs. Arterial oxygen tension (P < 0.05) and coronary perfusion pressure (P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the CIO pigs. Arterial CO(2)-tension was subnormal in both groups and significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the IPPV-pigs (around 4.5 versus 3.0 kPa). The intratracheal pressure differed significantly (P < 0.001) between the two groups. It was negative in each decompression phase in the IPPV pigs in spite of 6 mmHg of PEEP. The CIO pigs had a positive intratracheal pressure during the whole cycle of mCPR, with a minimum pressure of 8 mmHg during each decompression phase. To conclude, mCPR combined with CIO gave adequate ventilation and significantly better oxygenation and coronary perfusion pressure than mCPR combined with IPPV.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较在LUCAS设备进行机械胸外按压-主动减压心肺复苏(mCPR)期间,气管内持续吹氧(CIO)与间歇正压通气(IPPV)在气体交换和血流动力学方面的疗效。对16头平均体重23千克(范围22 - 27千克)的猪进行电诱导室颤(VF)并停止通气。将它们随机分为两组(CIO组与IPPV组)。室颤8分钟后开始mCPR,并在常温下持续进行30分钟,之后在持续mCPR期间尝试除颤。8头CIO组猪中有8头恢复自主循环,8头IPPV组猪中有4头恢复自主循环。CIO组猪的动脉血氧分压(P < 0.05)和冠状动脉灌注压(P < 0.01)显著更高。两组的动脉血二氧化碳分压均低于正常,IPPV组猪的更低(约4.5对3.0千帕,P < 0.05)。两组间气管内压力差异显著(P < 0.001)。尽管有6厘米水柱的呼气末正压(PEEP),IPPV组猪在每个减压阶段气管内压力均为负值。CIO组猪在mCPR的整个周期内气管内压力为正值,每个减压阶段的最小压力为8厘米水柱。总之,与mCPR联合IPPV相比,mCPR联合CIO能提供足够的通气,且氧合和冠状动脉灌注压显著更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验