Murray Micah M, Foxe Deirdre M, Javitt Daniel C, Foxe John J
The Functional Electrical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Neuropsychology Division and Radiodiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Service, Vaudois Univerity Hospital Center, Nestlé Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Neurosci. 2004 Aug 4;24(31):6898-903. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1996-04.2004.
Normal visual perception requires differentiating foreground from background objects. Differences in physical attributes sometimes determine this relationship. Often such differences must instead be inferred, as when two objects or their parts have the same luminance. Modal completion refers to such perceptual "filling-in" of object borders that are accompanied by concurrent brightness enhancement, in turn termed illusory contours (ICs). Amodal completion is filling-in without concurrent brightness enhancement. Presently there are controversies regarding whether both completion processes use a common neural mechanism and whether perceptual filling-in is a bottom-up, feedforward process initiating at the lowest levels of the cortical visual pathway or commences at higher-tier regions. We previously examined modal completion (Murray et al., 2002) and provided evidence that the earliest modal IC sensitivity occurs within higher-tier object recognition areas of the lateral occipital complex (LOC). We further proposed that previous observations of IC sensitivity in lower-tier regions likely reflect feedback modulation from the LOC. The present study tested these proposals, examining the commonality between modal and amodal completion mechanisms with high-density electrical mapping, spatiotemporal topographic analyses, and the local autoregressive average distributed linear inverse source estimation. A common initial mechanism for both types of completion processes (140 msec) that manifested as a modulation in response strength within higher-tier visual areas, including the LOC and parietal structures, is demonstrated, whereas differential mechanisms were evident only at a subsequent time period (240 msec), with amodal completion relying on continued strong responses in these structures.
正常的视觉感知需要区分前景和背景物体。物理属性的差异有时决定了这种关系。通常,这种差异必须通过推断得出,比如当两个物体或其部分具有相同的亮度时。模态完成指的是对物体边界进行这种感知上的“填补”,同时伴随着亮度增强,这种亮度增强进而被称为虚幻轮廓(ICs)。非模态完成是指没有同时发生亮度增强的填补。目前,关于这两种完成过程是否使用共同的神经机制,以及感知填补是自下而上、从皮质视觉通路的最低层级开始的前馈过程,还是从更高层级区域开始,存在争议。我们之前研究了模态完成(Murray等人,2002年),并提供证据表明最早的模态IC敏感性出现在枕外侧复合体(LOC)的更高层级物体识别区域内。我们进一步提出,之前在较低层级区域观察到的IC敏感性可能反映了来自LOC的反馈调制。本研究对这些提议进行了测试,通过高密度电图、时空地形分析以及局部自回归平均分布式线性逆源估计,研究了模态和非模态完成机制之间的共性。结果表明,两种类型的完成过程存在一个共同的初始机制(140毫秒),表现为包括LOC和顶叶结构在内的更高层级视觉区域内反应强度的调制,而差异机制仅在随后的时间段(240毫秒)才明显,非模态完成依赖于这些结构中持续的强烈反应。