Ewert Stephan D, Dau Torsten
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Medizinische Physik, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Jul;116(1):478-90. doi: 10.1121/1.1737399.
Three experiments are presented to explore the relative role of "external" signal variability and "internal" resolution limitations of the auditory system in the detection and discrimination of amplitude modulations (AM). In the first experiment, AM-depth discrimination performance was determined using sinusoidally modulated broadband-noise and pure-tone carriers. The AM index, m, of the standard ranged from -28 to -3 dB (expressed as 20 log m). AM-depth discrimination thresholds were found to be a fraction of the AM depth of the standard for standards down to -18 dB, in the case of the pure-tone carrier, and down to -8 dB, in the case of the broadband-noise carrier. For smaller standards, AM-depth discrimination required a fixed increase in AM depth, independent of the AM depth of the standard. In the second experiment, AM-detection thresholds were obtained for signal-modulation frequencies of 4, 16, 64, and 256 Hz, applied to either a band-limited random-noise carrier or a deterministic ("frozen") noise carrier, as a function of carrier bandwidth (8 to 2048 Hz). In general, detection thresholds were higher for the random- than for the frozen-noise carriers. For both carrier types, thresholds followed the pattern expected from frequency-selective processing of the stimulus envelope. The third experiment investigated AM masking at 4, 16, and 64 Hz in the presence of a narrow-band masker modulation. The variability of the masker was changed from entirely frozen to entirely random, while the long-term average envelope power spectrum was held constant. The experiment examined the validity of a long-term average quantity as the decision variable, and the role of memory in experiments with frozen-noise maskers. The empirical results were compared to predictions obtained with two modulation-filterbank models. The predictions revealed that AM-depth discrimination and AM detection are limited by a combination of the external signal variability and an internal "Weber-fraction" noise process.
本文介绍了三个实验,以探究听觉系统的“外部”信号变异性和“内部”分辨率限制在幅度调制(AM)检测与辨别中的相对作用。在第一个实验中,使用正弦调制的宽带噪声和纯音载波来确定AM深度辨别性能。标准的AM指数m范围为-28至-3 dB(表示为20 log m)。对于纯音载波,当标准降至-18 dB时,AM深度辨别阈值是标准AM深度的一小部分;对于宽带噪声载波,当标准降至-8 dB时,AM深度辨别阈值也是标准AM深度的一小部分。对于较小的标准,AM深度辨别需要AM深度有固定的增加,而与标准的AM深度无关。在第二个实验中,针对4、16、64和256 Hz的信号调制频率,将其应用于带限随机噪声载波或确定性(“冻结”)噪声载波,作为载波带宽(8至2048 Hz)的函数,获得了AM检测阈值。一般来说,随机噪声载波的检测阈值高于冻结噪声载波。对于这两种载波类型,阈值都遵循刺激包络频率选择性处理所预期的模式。第三个实验研究了在存在窄带掩蔽调制的情况下,4、16和64 Hz处的AM掩蔽。掩蔽器的变异性从完全冻结变为完全随机,同时长期平均包络功率谱保持恒定。该实验检验了长期平均量作为决策变量的有效性,以及记忆在冻结噪声掩蔽器实验中的作用。将实验结果与用两种调制滤波器组模型获得的预测结果进行了比较。预测结果表明,AM深度辨别和AM检测受到外部信号变异性和内部“韦伯分数”噪声过程的共同限制。