Moore Rick A, Berner Eta S
Theater Medical Information Program Product Development, US Air Force, USA.
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2004 Summer;18(3):44-50.
Students often have a difficult time determining the differences among training programs and deciding which best meets their needs, especially in the area of health and medical informatics, where training programs often have similar names but very different content. This manuscript describes a methodology for systematically analyzing the content of graduate programs in health and medical informatics. This methodology attempts to determine if the systematic analysis of published competencies can be used to identify differences among the ever-increasing number of informatics graduate programs. The authors use the methodology to compare four graduate informatics programs to two sets of professional criteria: the Certified Professional in Healthcare Information Management Systems (CPHIMS) exam objectives published by HIMSS and the recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Working Group for Education (WG1) for competencies in medical informatics. This article discusses similarities and differences among the programs. Criteria and the implications of the differences are described.
学生们常常难以确定不同培训项目之间的差异,也难以决定哪一个最能满足他们的需求,尤其是在健康与医学信息学领域,该领域的培训项目名称往往相似,但内容却大不相同。本文描述了一种系统分析健康与医学信息学研究生项目内容的方法。该方法试图确定已发布的能力标准的系统分析是否可用于识别日益增多的信息学研究生项目之间的差异。作者运用该方法将四个信息学研究生项目与两组专业标准进行比较:一组是医疗卫生信息管理系统认证专业人员(CPHIMS)考试目标,由医疗卫生信息与管理系统协会(HIMSS)发布;另一组是国际医学信息学协会(IMIA)教育工作组(WG1)对医学信息学能力的建议。本文讨论了这些项目之间的异同。描述了标准以及差异的影响。