Weber Marc-André, Bock Michael, Plathow Christian, Wasser Klaus, Fink Christian, Zuna Ivan, Schmähl Astrid, Berger Irina, Kauczor Hans-Ulrich, Schoenberg Stefan O
Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Invest Radiol. 2004 Sep;39(9):554-64. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000131888.39636.c5.
We sought to compare respiratory-gated high-spatial resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radial MRI with ultra-short echo times with computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of asbestos-related pleural disease.
Twenty-one patients with confirmed long-term asbestos exposure were examined with a CT and a 1.5-T MR unit. High-resolution respiratory-gated T2w turbo-spin-echo (TSE), breath-hold T1w TSE, and contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed breath-hold T1w TSE images with an inplane resolution of less than 1 mm were acquired. To visualize pleural plaques with a short T2* time, a pulse sequence with radial k-space-sampling was used (TE = 0.5 milliseconds) before and after administration of Gd-DTPA. CT and MR images were assessed by 4 readers for the number and calcification of plaques, extension of pleural fibrosis, extrapleural fat, detection of mesothelioma and its infiltration into adjacent tissues, and detection of pleural effusion. Observer agreement was studied with the use of kappa statistics.
The MRI protocol allowed for differentiation between normal pleura and pleura with plaques. Interobserver agreement was comparable for MRI and CT in detecting pleural plaques (median kappa = 0.72 for MRI and 0.73 for CT) and significantly higher with CT than with MRI for detection of plaque calcification (median kappa 0.86 for CT and 0.72 for MRI; P = 0.03). Median sensitivity of MRI was 88% for detection of plaque calcification compared with CT. For assessment of pleural thickening, pleural effusion, and extrapleural fat, interobserver agreement with MRI was significantly higher than with CT (median kappa 0.71 and 0.23 for pleural thickening, 0.87 and 0.62 for pleural effusion, and 0.7 and 0.56 for extrapleural fat, respectively; P < 0.05). For detection of mesothelioma, median kappa was 0.63 for MRI and 0.58 for CT.
High-resolution MR sequences and radial MRI achieve a comparable interobserver agreement in detecting pleural plaques and even a higher interobserver agreement in assessing pleural thickening, pleural effusion, and extrapleural fat when compared with CT.
我们试图比较呼吸门控高空间分辨率磁共振成像(MRI)和具有超短回波时间的径向MRI与计算机断层扫描(CT)在诊断石棉相关胸膜疾病中的应用。
对21名确诊长期接触石棉的患者进行CT和1.5-T MR检查。采集高分辨率呼吸门控T2加权快速自旋回波(TSE)、屏气T1加权TSE以及对比增强脂肪抑制屏气T1加权TSE图像,其平面分辨率小于1毫米。为了可视化具有短T2*时间的胸膜斑,在注射钆喷酸葡胺(Gd-DTPA)之前和之后使用具有径向k空间采样的脉冲序列(TE = 0.5毫秒)。4名阅片者对CT和MR图像进行评估,以确定胸膜斑的数量和钙化情况、胸膜纤维化的范围、胸膜外脂肪、间皮瘤的检测及其对相邻组织的浸润以及胸腔积液的检测。使用kappa统计量研究观察者间的一致性。
MRI方案能够区分正常胸膜和有胸膜斑的胸膜。在检测胸膜斑方面,MRI和CT的观察者间一致性相当(MRI的中位数kappa = 0.72,CT的中位数kappa = 0.73),而在检测胸膜斑钙化方面,CT的观察者间一致性显著高于MRI(CT的中位数kappa为0.86,MRI的中位数kappa为0.72;P = 0.03)。与CT相比,MRI检测胸膜斑钙化的中位敏感性为88%。在评估胸膜增厚、胸腔积液和胸膜外脂肪方面,MRI的观察者间一致性显著高于CT(胸膜增厚的中位数kappa分别为0.71和0.23,胸腔积液的中位数kappa分别为0.87和0.62,胸膜外脂肪的中位数kappa分别为0.7和0.56;P < 0.05)。在检测间皮瘤方面,MRI的中位数kappa为0.63,CT的中位数kappa为0.58。
与CT相比,高分辨率MR序列和径向MRI在检测胸膜斑方面具有相当可比观察者间一致性,在评估胸膜增厚、胸腔积液和胸膜外脂肪方面甚至具有更高的观察者间一致性。