Freye C J, Wagner N B, Howe C M, Stack N C, Ideker R E, Selvester R H, Wagner G S
Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
J Electrocardiol. 1992 Jan;25(1):19-23. doi: 10.1016/0022-0736(92)90125-j.
Electrocardiographic differentiation between left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and myocardial infarction (MI) is often difficult because both diagnoses are based primarily on QRS changes on the electrocardiogram (ECG). The specific goal of this study was the development of ECG criteria that could be used with the complete Selvester QRS scoring system for MI size in patients with LVH. A study population of 127 patients had significant aortic valve disease verified by cardiac catheterization. Inclusion in the study required no significant coronary artery disease, no focal contraction abnormality on the left ventriculogram, and no documented MI. Quantitative criteria for LVH developed by Bonner (IBM) and also those developed by the Cornell group were used to determine the ECG evidence for LVH in each patient. One or both sets of criteria were met in 110 (87%) of the 127 patients. This group was compared to a previously evaluated control population of 500 normal subjects. The complete 54-criteria, 32-point QRS MI size scoring system was applied to the 12-lead ECG of both groups. The score was 98% specific in the normal controls and 73% specific in the LVH group using a score of greater than 3 points as diagnostic for MI. Of the 54 individual QRS criteria, 16 failed to achieve 95% specificity in the LVH population: 13 were for anterior (and apical), 2 for inferior, and 1 for posterior locations. Of these 16, minor modifications to 11 were sufficient to achieve the 95% specificity standard.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
左心室肥厚(LVH)与心肌梗死(MI)之间的心电图鉴别诊断往往存在困难,因为这两种诊断主要都基于心电图(ECG)上的QRS波变化。本研究的具体目标是制定可与完整的塞尔维斯特QRS评分系统一起用于评估LVH患者MI大小的心电图标准。127例经心导管检查证实患有严重主动脉瓣疾病的患者纳入了研究。纳入研究要求无明显冠状动脉疾病、左心室造影无局灶性收缩异常且无MI记录。使用邦纳(IBM)制定的LVH定量标准以及康奈尔研究小组制定的标准来确定每位患者LVH的心电图证据。127例患者中有110例(87%)符合一套或两套标准。将该组与先前评估的500名正常受试者的对照人群进行比较。完整的54条标准、32分的QRS MI大小评分系统应用于两组的12导联心电图。以大于3分作为MI的诊断标准时,该评分在正常对照组中的特异性为98%,在LVH组中的特异性为73%。在54条单独的QRS标准中,有16条在LVH人群中未达到95%的特异性:13条针对前壁(和心尖),2条针对下壁,1条针对后壁。在这16条标准中,对11条进行微小修改就足以达到95%的特异性标准。(摘要截取自250词)