Park Peter J, Cao Yun Anna, Lee Sun Young, Kim Jong-Woo, Chang Mi Sook, Hart Rebecca, Choi Sangdun
Children's Hospital Informatics Program and Harvard Medical School, 320 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Biotechnol. 2004 Sep 9;112(3):225-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.05.006.
DNA microarray technology has been widely used to simultaneously determine the expression levels of thousands of genes. A variety of approaches have been used, both in the implementation of this technology and in the analysis of the large amount of expression data. However, several practical issues still have not been resolved in a satisfactory manner, and among the most critical is the lack of agreement in the results obtained in different array platforms. In this study, we present a comparison of several microarray platforms [Affymetrix oligonucleotide arrays, custom complementary DNA (cDNA) arrays, and custom oligo arrays printed with oligonucleotides from three different sources] as well as analysis of various methods used for microarray target preparation and the reference design. The results indicate that the pairwise correlations of expression levels between platforms are relative low overall but that the log ratios of the highly expressed genes are strongly correlated, especially between Affymetrix and cDNA arrays. The microarray measurements were compared with quantitative real-time-polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) results for 23 genes, and the varying degrees of agreement for each platform were characterized. We have also developed and tested a double amplification method which allows the use of smaller amounts of starting material. The added round of amplification produced reproducible results as compared to the arrays hybridized with single round amplified targets. Finally, the reliability of using a universal RNA reference for two-channel microarrays was tested and the results suggest that comparisons of multiple experimental conditions using the same control can be accurate.
DNA微阵列技术已被广泛用于同时测定数千个基因的表达水平。在这项技术的实施以及大量表达数据的分析中,已经使用了多种方法。然而,几个实际问题仍未得到令人满意的解决,其中最关键的问题之一是不同阵列平台所获得的结果缺乏一致性。在本研究中,我们比较了几种微阵列平台[Affymetrix寡核苷酸阵列、定制互补DNA(cDNA)阵列以及用来自三种不同来源的寡核苷酸打印的定制寡核苷酸阵列],并分析了用于微阵列靶标制备和参考设计的各种方法。结果表明,平台之间表达水平的成对相关性总体相对较低,但高表达基因的对数比值具有很强的相关性,尤其是在Affymetrix阵列和cDNA阵列之间。将微阵列测量结果与23个基因的定量实时聚合酶链反应(QRT-PCR)结果进行了比较,并对每个平台的不同程度的一致性进行了表征。我们还开发并测试了一种双重扩增方法,该方法允许使用较少量的起始材料。与用单轮扩增靶标杂交的阵列相比,额外的一轮扩增产生了可重复的结果。最后,测试了使用通用RNA参考进行双通道微阵列的可靠性,结果表明使用相同对照对多个实验条件进行比较可以是准确的。