Aetna Health, Inc. v. Davila: Implications for public health policy.
作者信息
Rosenbaum Sara, Teitelbaum Joel
机构信息
Department of Health Policy, George Washington University Medical Center.
出版信息
Public Health Rep. 2004 Sep-Oct;119(5):510-2. doi: 10.1016/j.phr.2004.07.009.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Aetna Health, Inc. v. Davila: Implications for public health policy.安泰健康保险公司诉达维拉案：对公共卫生政策的影响。
Public Health Rep. 2004 Sep-Oct;119(5):510-2. doi: 10.1016/j.phr.2004.07.009.
2
Supreme Court clarifies the breadth of ERISA preemption.
Hosp Law Newsl. 2004 Oct;21(12):1-7.
3
Supreme Court rules HMO suits are preempted.最高法院裁定医疗保险机构诉讼受优先原则制约。
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Winter;32(4):774-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01984.x.
4
ERISA. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.《雇员退休收入保障法》。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jan;174(1):19-25. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.1.1740019.
5
6
7
The final chapter (maybe) of preemption of HMO accountability under state law.根据州法律，健康维护组织（HMO）责任优先原则（或许）的最后一章。
Health Care Law Mon. 2004 Feb:15-27.
8
9
Workers of the world, panic!全世界的工人们，恐慌吧！
Fortune. 2004 Jul 12;150(1):36, 38.
10
The people vs HMOs.
Time. 1999 Feb 1;153(4):46-7.
Zotero 插件