Siguret Virginie, Pautas Eric, Gouin Isabelle
Laboratoire d'Hématologie and Unité de Gériatrie Aiguë, Hôpital Charles Foix (University Hospital of Paris), Ivry/Seine, France.
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2004 Sep;10(5):366-70. doi: 10.1097/01.mcp.0000136900.91924.3d.
Low molecular weight heparin has become the treatment of choice for venous thromboembolism events and acute coronary syndromes. In contrast to unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparins are mainly excreted by the kidney. Thus, repeated administration of therapeutic doses of low molecular weight heparins may lead to overdosage and/or an accumulation effect in patients with renal impairment, such as the elderly. Moreover, older patients are often excluded from clinical trials. Little evidence is available to assess the risk/benefit ratio of low molecular weight heparins used at therapeutic dosages in elderly patients with or without renal insufficiency in normal clinical practice.
Pharmacovigilance data, case reports, and observational studies reporting major bleeding complications in the elderly highlight the potential risk of using low molecular weight heparins at therapeutic dosages in these patients. An evaluation of renal function is thus essential before therapy with low molecular weight heparins is begun. Moreover, multiple-dose pharmacokinetic studies in the elderly have shown that the pharmacokinetic response to impaired renal function, especially the risk of accumulation effect, may differ among preparations of low molecular weight heparins.
Three approaches to improve the safety of low molecular weight heparins in the elderly are discussed: (1) to replace low molecular weight heparin therapy with monitored unfractionated heparin therapy in cases of severe renal insufficiency, but comparative studies are necessary to clarify whether unfractionated heparin offers better safety in this setting; (2) to use initial reduced dosages in elderly patients with or without renal failure, but these regimens have to be validated for each low molecular weight heparin in terms of efficacy in controlled trials; and (3) to monitor anti-Xa activity to detect any overdosage and/or any accumulation effect of low molecular weight heparins.
低分子量肝素已成为静脉血栓栓塞事件和急性冠状动脉综合征的首选治疗药物。与普通肝素不同,低分子量肝素主要通过肾脏排泄。因此,在肾功能不全患者(如老年人)中重复给予治疗剂量的低分子量肝素可能导致过量用药和/或蓄积效应。此外,老年患者往往被排除在临床试验之外。在正常临床实践中,几乎没有证据可用于评估治疗剂量的低分子量肝素在有或无肾功能不全的老年患者中的风险/效益比。
药物警戒数据、病例报告以及关于老年患者严重出血并发症的观察性研究均强调了在这些患者中使用治疗剂量低分子量肝素的潜在风险。因此,在开始使用低分子量肝素治疗前评估肾功能至关重要。此外,针对老年人的多剂量药代动力学研究表明,不同低分子量肝素制剂对肾功能损害的药代动力学反应,尤其是蓄积效应的风险可能有所不同。
讨论了三种提高低分子量肝素在老年人中安全性的方法:(1)在严重肾功能不全的情况下,用监测的普通肝素治疗替代低分子量肝素治疗,但需要进行比较研究以明确普通肝素在此情况下是否具有更好的安全性;(2)在有或无肾衰竭的老年患者中使用初始减量剂量,但这些方案必须在对照试验中针对每种低分子量肝素的疗效进行验证;(3)监测抗Xa活性以检测低分子量肝素的任何过量用药和/或任何蓄积效应。