Schmitt Matthias, Qasem Ahmad, McEniery Carmel, Wilkinson Ian B, Tatarinoff Vicki, Noble Kate, Klemes John, Payne Nicola, Frenneaux Michael P, Cockcroft John, Avolio Albert
Wales Heart Research Institute, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004 Sep;287(3):H1167-71. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00101.2004.
Arterial distensibility, assessed by the pulse-wave velocity (PWV), is an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk. We investigated whether natriuretic peptides, acting locally, modify conduit artery distensibility in vivo. All studies were conducted in anesthetized sheep (n = 18) by using a validated ovine hindlimb model. In brief, the PWV was calculated, with the use of the foot-to-foot methodology, from two pressure waveforms recorded simultaneously with a high-fidelity dual pressure-sensing catheter placed in the common iliac artery. Drugs were infused either proximally, via the catheter to perfuse the segment of artery under study, or distally, via the sheath to control for any reflex changes in flow or sympathetic activation. First, the effects of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and c-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) were studied. Second, the role of endogenous ANP was investigated by infusing the natriuretic peptide receptor type A (NPRA)-selective receptor antagonist A71915. Third, A71915 was coinfused with ANP. Fourth, the NPRC-selective agonist cANF was infused. Infusion of CNP or des-[Gln18Ser19Gly20Leu21Gly22]-ANF-(4-23)-NH2 (cANF) had no effect on iliac PWV. However, infusion of ANP, and to a lesser degree BNP, resulted in a reduction in PWV (-9%; P < 0.01 and -6%; P < 0.05, respectively). A71915 increased iliac PWV from 2.97 +/- 0.13 to 3.06 +/- 0.13 m/s; P < 0.01. Coinfusion of A71915 with ANP completely abolished the effects of ANP (P < 0.01). Importantly, ANP-BNP infusion via the sheath did not alter PWV. In conclusion, ANP, and to a lesser extent BNP, modify large artery distensibility via the NPRA receptor. Neither CNP nor cANF altered PWV, suggesting that the NPRB and NPRC receptors do not acutely influence distensibility in vivo.
通过脉搏波速度(PWV)评估的动脉扩张性是心血管风险的独立预测指标。我们研究了局部作用的利钠肽是否会在体内改变传导动脉的扩张性。所有研究均在麻醉的绵羊(n = 18)身上进行,采用经过验证的绵羊后肢模型。简而言之,使用脚对脚方法,根据通过置于髂总动脉的高保真双压力传感导管同时记录的两个压力波形来计算PWV。药物通过导管向近端注入,以灌注所研究的动脉段,或通过鞘管向远端注入,以控制血流或交感神经激活的任何反射性变化。首先,研究了心房利钠肽(ANP)、脑利钠肽(BNP)和C型利钠肽(CNP)的作用。其次,通过注入A型利钠肽受体(NPRA)选择性受体拮抗剂A71915来研究内源性ANP的作用。第三,将A71915与ANP联合注入。第四,注入NPRC选择性激动剂cANF。注入CNP或去[Gln18Ser19Gly20Leu21Gly22]-ANF-(4 - 23)-NH2(cANF)对髂动脉PWV没有影响。然而,注入ANP以及程度较轻的BNP会导致PWV降低(分别为-9%;P < 0.01和-6%;P < 0.05)。A71915使髂动脉PWV从2.97±0.13增加到3.06±0.13 m/s;P < 0.01。将A71915与ANP联合注入完全消除了ANP的作用(P < 0.01)。重要的是,通过鞘管注入ANP - BNP不会改变PWV。总之,ANP以及程度较轻的BNP通过NPRA受体改变大动脉扩张性。CNP和cANF均未改变PWV,表明NPRB和NPRC受体不会在体内急性影响扩张性。