Ramakrishnan Rohini, Cheung Wing K, Wacholtz Mary C, Minton Neil, Jusko William J
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Sep;44(9):991-1002. doi: 10.1177/0091270004268411.
This study describes a pharmacokinetic (PK) model to account for serum recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) concentrations in healthy volunteers following intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) dosing; it also characterizes the pharmacodynamics (PD) of SC rHuEpo effects on reticulocytes, red blood cells (RBC), and hemoglobin (Hb) in blood. Data were obtained from 4 clinical studies carried out in healthy volunteers. Epoetin alfa (rHuEpo) was administered as 5 single IV doses ranging from 10 to 500 IU/kg, as 8 single SC doses ranging from 300 to 2400 IU/kg, and as 2 multiple SC dosage regimens (150 IU/kg/3 times a week [tiw] and 600 IU/kg/wk). A dual-absorption rate model (fast zero-order and slow first-order inputs) with nonlinear disposition characterized the PK of SC rHuEpo. A high K(m) value was obtained indicating that clearance was mildly nonlinear. Absorption was slow (t(max) approximately 24 hours), and the bioavailability of SC rHuEpo increased with dose (ranging from 46%-100%). A catenary cell production and loss model with a feedback down regulation component was used to fit the reticulocyte data yielding estimates of the stimulatory capacity (S(max)), sensitivity (SC(50)), and life span parameters. These parameters were used for simulations of RBC and Hb profiles. An SC(50) of 27 to 61 IU/L was estimated indicating that low physiological plasma rHuEpo concentrations were sufficient to produce pharmacological effects. No marked sex-dependent differences in clinical responses to rHuEpo therapy were found despite baseline differences. Realistic pharmacokinetic and physiological models accounted for clinical responses from a wide array of dosing conditions with rHuEpo. The rationale for greater efficacy of SC administration of rHuEpo compared to IV was ascertained.
本研究描述了一种药代动力学(PK)模型,用于解释健康志愿者静脉注射(IV)和皮下注射(SC)给药后血清重组人促红细胞生成素(rHuEpo)的浓度;它还表征了皮下注射rHuEpo对血液中网织红细胞、红细胞(RBC)和血红蛋白(Hb)的药效学(PD)作用。数据来自在健康志愿者中进行的4项临床研究。α-促红细胞生成素(rHuEpo)以5种10至500 IU/kg的单次静脉注射剂量、8种300至2400 IU/kg的单次皮下注射剂量以及2种多次皮下注射给药方案(150 IU/kg/每周3次[tiw]和600 IU/kg/周)给药。具有非线性处置的双吸收速率模型(快速零级和慢速一级输入)表征了皮下注射rHuEpo的药代动力学。获得了较高的K(m)值,表明清除呈轻度非线性。吸收缓慢(t(max)约为24小时),皮下注射rHuEpo的生物利用度随剂量增加(范围为46%-100%)。使用具有反馈下调成分的链式细胞产生和损失模型来拟合网织红细胞数据,得出刺激能力(S(max))、敏感性(SC(50))和寿命参数的估计值。这些参数用于模拟红细胞和血红蛋白曲线。估计SC(50)为27至61 IU/L,表明低生理血浆rHuEpo浓度足以产生药理作用。尽管存在基线差异,但未发现rHuEpo治疗的临床反应有明显的性别依赖性差异。逼真的药代动力学和生理学模型解释了rHuEpo在各种给药条件下的临床反应。确定了皮下注射rHuEpo比静脉注射更有效的原理。