Smith William B, Dowell James A, Pratt Raymond D
New Orleans Center for Clinical Research, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Clin Ther. 2007 Jul;29(7):1368-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.07.014.
Epoetin delta, unlike recombinant erythropoietins, is produced in a human cell line and therefore has a human-type glycosylation profile.
The pharmacokinetics of epoetin delta were examined in 2 studies in healthy volunteers and 2 studies in patients with chronic kidney disease.
In study 1, 21 healthy men were randomized to receive epoetin delta 15, 40, or 100 IU/kg IV tiw or placebo for 4 weeks. In study 2, an open-label, cross-over study, 32 healthy volunteers were randomized to receive single doses of epoetin delta 75 IU/kg IV or SC. In study 3, 40 patients receiving hemodialysis were withdrawn from epoetin alfa and randomized to receive epoetin delta or epoetin alfa 50 or 100 IU/kg tiw for 4 weeks. Study 4 was a single-dose study comparing epoetin delta 150 and 300 IU/kg IV or SC in 28 hemodialysis patients.
In study 1, after repeated dosing (day 24) in healthy men, mean C(max) values ranged from 219.9 to 1793.0 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay units (EU)/L; AUC from 827 to 9318 h x EU/L; C1 from 0.014 to 0.024 L/h per kg; Vd from 0.067 to 0.076 L/kg; and t(1/2) from 2.23 to 3.35 hours. There was evidence of a dose-dependent effect of epoetin delta on hemoglobin levels and hematocrit, with doses of 40 and 100 IU/kg associated with significant increases compared with 15 IU/kg (P < 0.001 for dose trend). The only adverse event occurring in > or = 10% of healthy individuals in study 1 was headache (1 [20.0%] in the epoetin delta 15 IU-kg group, 3 [60.0%] in the epoetin delta 100-IU/kg group, 2 [33.3%] in the placebo group). In study 2 in healthy volunteers, mean values for epoetin delta 75 IU/kg IV were 1771 EU/L for C(max), 10,632 h x EU/L for AUC, 0.010 L/h per kg for Cl, 0.074 L/kg for Vd, and 5.12 hours for t(1/2); the corresponding values for epoetin delta 75 IU/kg SC were 113 EU/L, 3231 h x EU/L, 0.035 L/h per kg, 0.760 L/kg, and 14.90 hours. The serum epoetin delta concentration peaked after 10.9 hours with subcutaneous administration. The most common adverse event in study 2 was back pain (10 [31.3%] individuals). In study 3 in patients receiving hemodialysis, mean values for C(max) and AUC with a single dose of epoetin delta 50 IU/kg were 1103 EU/L and 10,896 h x EU/L, respectively, and with the corresponding dose of epoetin alfa were 1354 EU/L and 9957 h x EU/L. Values for the 100-IU/kg doses were approximately double those for the 50-IU/kg doses. Values for Cl, Vd, and t(1/2) were numerically similar for epoetin delta and epoietin alfa across doses. Epoetin delta 100 IU/kg was associated with a numerically greater rate of increase in hemoglobin compared with the 50-IU/kg dose (mean, 0.025 vs -0.004, respectively); the results were similar for epoetin alfa (0.029 vs -0.001). The difference between epoetin alfa and epoetin delta was not statistically significant. The most common adverse events were related to edema (peripheral edema: 60%/50% for epoetin delta 50/100 IU/kg and 60%/60% for epoetin alfa 50/100 IU/kg; facial edema: 30%/30% and 50%/70%, respectively; generalized edema: 50%/30% and 40%/40%). In study 4 in patients receiving hemodialysis, mean C(max) values with epoetin delta 150 and 300 IU/kg IV were 3257 and 4770 EU/L, respectively; the corresponding mean values were 36,208 and 77,736 h x EU/L for AUC, 0.007 and 0.005 L/h per kg for Cl; 0.097 L/kg for Vd in both groups; and 9.9 and 13.2 hours for t(1/2). With epoetin delta 150 and 300 IU/kg SC, the respective values were 162.2 and 467.7 EU/L, 9547 and 27,888 h x EU/L, 0.026 and 0.020 L/h per kg, 1.28 and 0.78 L/kg, and 33.1 and 27.8 hours. The only adverse event occurring in > or = 10% of subjects was headache (2 [40.0%] in the epoetin delta 150-IU/kg IV group, 3 [50.0%] in the epoetin delta 300-IU/kg SC group). No neutralizing anti-erythropoietin antibodies were detected in any individual. The bioavailability of subcutaneous epoetin delta is approximately 30%, and concentrations peak later and decline more slowly than with intravenous injection. Pharmacokinetic parameters in hemodialysis patients were similar to those in healthy individuals, although AUC and t(1/2) were numerically higher (by 49% and 34%, respectively).
These studies in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic kidney disease indicate that the pharmacokinetics of epoetin delta are dose dependent but nonlinear, leading to dose-dependent increases in hemoglobin levels. The pharmacodynamic response to epoetin delta appeared to be as expected for an epoetin.
与重组促红细胞生成素不同,δ-促红细胞生成素是在人细胞系中产生的,因此具有人源型糖基化谱。
在2项针对健康志愿者的研究和2项针对慢性肾病患者的研究中检测了δ-促红细胞生成素的药代动力学。
在研究1中,21名健康男性被随机分组,接受δ-促红细胞生成素15、40或100 IU/kg静脉注射,每周3次,共4周,或接受安慰剂治疗。在研究2中,一项开放标签的交叉研究,32名健康志愿者被随机分组,接受单次剂量的δ-促红细胞生成素75 IU/kg静脉注射或皮下注射。在研究3中,40名接受血液透析的患者停用促红细胞生成素α,随机接受δ-促红细胞生成素或促红细胞生成素α 50或100 IU/kg,每周3次,共4周。研究4是一项单剂量研究,比较28名血液透析患者静脉注射或皮下注射150和300 IU/kg的δ-促红细胞生成素。
在研究1中,健康男性重复给药(第24天)后,平均C(max)值范围为219.9至1793.0酶联免疫吸附测定单位(EU)/L;AUC为827至9318 h×EU/L;C1为0.014至0.024 L/h per kg;Vd为0.067至0.076 L/kg;t(1/2)为2.23至3.35小时。有证据表明δ-促红细胞生成素对血红蛋白水平和血细胞比容有剂量依赖性作用,40和100 IU/kg剂量组与15 IU/kg剂量组相比血红蛋白水平显著升高(剂量趋势P<0.001)。研究1中≥10%的健康个体发生的唯一不良事件是头痛(δ-促红细胞生成素15 IU/kg组1例[20.0%],δ-促红细胞生成素100 IU/kg组3例[60.0%],安慰剂组2例[33.3%])。在健康志愿者的研究2中,δ-促红细胞生成素75 IU/kg静脉注射的平均值为C(max) 1771 EU/L,AUC 10632 h×EU/L,Cl 0.010 L/h per kg,Vd 0.074 L/kg,t(1/2) 5.12小时;δ-促红细胞生成素75 IU/kg皮下注射的相应值为113 EU/L,3231 h×EU/L,0.035 L/h per kg,0.760 L/kg,14.90小时。皮下给药后血清δ-促红细胞生成素浓度在10.9小时达到峰值。研究2中最常见的不良事件是背痛(10例[31.3%]个体)。在接受血液透析的患者的研究3中,单次剂量的δ-促红细胞生成素50 IU/kg的C(max)和AUC平均值分别为1103 EU/L和10896 h×EU/L,相应剂量的促红细胞生成素α分别为1354 EU/L和9957 h×EU/L。100 IU/kg剂量的值约为50 IU/kg剂量的两倍。δ-促红细胞生成素和促红细胞生成素α各剂量的Cl、Vd和t(1/2)数值相似。与50 IU/kg剂量相比,δ-促红细胞生成素100 IU/kg组血红蛋白升高率在数值上更高(平均值分别为0.025和-0.004);促红细胞生成素α的结果相似(0.029和-0.001)。促红细胞生成素α和δ-促红细胞生成素之间的差异无统计学意义。最常见的不良事件与水肿有关(外周水肿:δ-促红细胞生成素50/100 IU/kg组为60%/50%,促红细胞生成素α 50/100 IU/kg组为60%/60%;面部水肿:分别为30%/30%和50%/70%;全身性水肿:50%/30%和40%/40%)。在接受血液透析的患者的研究4中,δ-促红细胞生成素150和300 IU/kg静脉注射的平均C(max)值分别为3257和4770 EU/L;AUC的相应平均值分别为36208和77736 h×EU/L,Cl为0.007和0.005 L/h per kg;两组Vd均为0.097 L/kg,t(1/2)分别为9.9和13.2小时。δ-促红细胞生成素150和300 IU/kg皮下注射时,相应值分别为162.2和467.7 EU/L,9547和27888 h×EU/L,0.026和0.020 L/h per kg,1.28和0.78 L/kg,33.1和27.8小时。≥10%的受试者发生的唯一不良事件是头痛(δ-促红细胞生成素150 IU/kg静脉注射组2例[40.0%],δ-促红细胞生成素300 IU/kg皮下注射组3例[50.0%])。任何个体均未检测到中和性抗促红细胞生成素抗体。皮下注射δ-促红细胞生成素的生物利用度约为30%,与静脉注射相比,浓度达到峰值的时间更晚,下降更慢。血液透析患者的药代动力学参数与健康个体相似,尽管AUC和t(1/2)在数值上更高(分别高49%和34%)。
这些在健康志愿者和慢性肾病患者中的研究表明,δ-促红细胞生成素的药代动力学具有剂量依赖性但非线性,导致血红蛋白水平呈剂量依赖性升高。δ-促红细胞生成素的药效学反应似乎与促红细胞生成素预期的反应一致。