Kuliev Anver, Verlinsky Yury
Reproductive Genetics Institute, Chicago, IL 60657, USA.
Hum Reprod Update. 2004 Sep-Oct;10(5):401-7. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh036.
Direct testing of the outcome of the first and second meiotic divisions has become possible with the introduction of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for aneuploidies. Testing of oocytes by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of the first and second polar bodies showed that more than half of oocytes from the IVF patients aged 35 years and older had chromosomal abnormalities, which originated from errors in meiosis I or meiosis II, or both: 41.9% of oocytes were aneuploid after meiosis I and 37.3% aneuploid after meiosis II, with 29.1% of these oocytes having both meiosis I and meiosis II errors. As a result, one third of oocytes detected as normal after meiosis I contained the meiosis II errors, and two thirds of those with meiosis II errors were already abnormal following meiosis I. Although the rates of chromosomal abnormalities deriving from meiosis I and II were comparable, meiosis I errors predominantly resulted in extra chromosome (chromatid) material in oocytes, in contrast to a random distribution of extra and missing chromatids after meiosis II. The majority of meiosis I abnormalities were represented by chromatid errors, which seem to be the major source of chromosomal abnormalities in the resulting embryos. Approximately one third of aneuploid oocytes deriving from sequential errors in the first and second meiotic divisions resulted in a balanced karyotype, representing a possible phenomenon of "aneuploidy rescue" during the second meiotic division. However, the majority of the embryos resulting from such oocytes appeared to be abnormal for the same or different chromosome(s), or were mosaic, suggesting a possible predisposition of the resulting embryos to further mitotic errors. Although the origin of a high frequency of mosaicism at the cleavage stage is not sufficiently understood, the mosaic embryos may originate from the chromosomally abnormal oocytes, as a result of a "trisomy rescue" mechanism during the first mitotic divisions, which renders polar body FISH analysis to have important clinical value for reliable pre-selection of aneuploidy-free embryos for transfer.
随着用于非整倍体的植入前基因诊断(PGD)技术的引入,对第一次和第二次减数分裂结果进行直接检测已成为可能。通过对第一极体和第二极体进行荧光原位杂交(FISH)分析来检测卵母细胞,结果显示,35岁及以上体外受精(IVF)患者的卵母细胞中,超过一半存在染色体异常,这些异常源于减数第一次分裂或减数第二次分裂或两者的错误:41.9%的卵母细胞在减数第一次分裂后为非整倍体,37.3%在减数第二次分裂后为非整倍体,其中29.1%的卵母细胞在减数第一次分裂和减数第二次分裂均存在错误。因此,在减数第一次分裂后检测为正常的卵母细胞中,三分之一含有减数第二次分裂错误,而在减数第二次分裂存在错误的卵母细胞中,三分之二在减数第一次分裂后就已经异常了。尽管源于减数第一次分裂和减数第二次分裂的染色体异常发生率相当,但减数第一次分裂错误主要导致卵母细胞中出现额外的染色体(染色单体)物质,这与减数第二次分裂后额外和缺失染色单体的随机分布形成对比。减数第一次分裂异常大多表现为染色单体错误,这似乎是所产生胚胎中染色体异常的主要来源。约三分之一源于减数第一次分裂和减数第二次分裂连续错误的非整倍体卵母细胞产生了平衡核型,这代表了减数第二次分裂期间可能存在的“非整倍体拯救”现象。然而,由这类卵母细胞产生的大多数胚胎似乎对于相同或不同的染色体而言是异常的,或者是嵌合体,这表明所产生的胚胎可能易于出现进一步的有丝分裂错误。尽管目前对卵裂期高频率嵌合体的起源了解尚不充分,但嵌合胚胎可能源于染色体异常的卵母细胞,这是第一次有丝分裂期间“三体拯救”机制的结果,这使得极体FISH分析对于可靠地预选无非整倍体胚胎用于移植具有重要临床价值。