Somkin Carol P, McPhee Stephen J, Nguyen Tung, Stewart Susan, Shema Sarah J, Nguyen Bang, Pasick Rena
Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California 94612, USA.
Med Care. 2004 Sep;42(9):914-26. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000135832.28672.61.
Access and satisfaction are determinants of preventive service use, but few studies have evaluated their role in breast and cervical cancer screening in multiethnic populations.
We sought to investigate the relationship between race/ethnicity, access, satisfaction, and regular mammogram and Papanicolaou test receipt in 5 racial/ethnic groups.
We conducted a telephone survey in 4 languages.
Our subjects were black, Chinese, Filipino, Latino, or white women aged 40 to 74 residing in Alameda County, California.
regular mammograms (last test within 15 months and another within 2 years prior) and Papanicolaou tests (36 months and 3 years, respectively). Independent: race/ethnicity, sociodemographic variables, access (health insurance, usual site of care, regular doctor, check-up within 12 months, knowing where to go, copayment for tests), and satisfaction (overall satisfaction scale, waiting times, test-related pain and embarrassment, test satisfaction).
Among women who had ever had a mammogram or Papanicolaou test, 54% and 77%, respectively, received regular screening. In multivariate analyses, regular mammography was positively associated with increased age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05 per year), private insurance (OR 1.7), check-up in the past year (OR 2.3), knowing where to go for mammography (OR 3.0), and greater satisfaction with processes of care (OR 1.04 per unit), and negatively with not knowing copayment amount (OR 0.4), too many forms to fill out (OR 0.5), embarrassment at the last mammogram (OR 0.6), and Filipino race/ethnicity. Similar results were found for regular Papanicolaou tests.
Access and satisfaction are important predictors of screening but do little to explain racial/ethnic variation. Tailored interventions to improve regular mammography and Papanicolaou test screening in multiethnic populations are needed.
可及性和满意度是预防性服务利用的决定因素,但很少有研究评估它们在多民族人群乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查中的作用。
我们试图调查5个种族/民族群体中种族/民族、可及性、满意度与定期乳房X光检查及巴氏试验接受情况之间的关系。
我们用4种语言进行了一项电话调查。
我们的研究对象是居住在加利福尼亚州阿拉米达县、年龄在40至74岁之间的黑人、华裔、菲律宾裔、拉丁裔或白人女性。
定期乳房X光检查(最后一次检查在15个月内且前两年内还有一次)和巴氏试验(分别为36个月和3年)。自变量:种族/民族、社会人口统计学变量、可及性(医疗保险、通常的就医地点、固定医生、12个月内的体检、知道去哪里、检查费用)和满意度(总体满意度量表、等待时间、检查相关疼痛和尴尬、检查满意度)。
在曾经做过乳房X光检查或巴氏试验的女性中,分别有54%和77%接受了定期筛查。在多变量分析中,定期乳房X光检查与年龄增长呈正相关(比值比[OR]每年1.05)、与私人保险呈正相关(OR 1.7)、与过去一年的体检呈正相关(OR 2.3)、与知道去哪里做乳房X光检查呈正相关(OR 3.0)、与对医疗过程的更高满意度呈正相关(每单位OR 1.04),与不知道检查费用金额呈负相关(OR 0.4)、与要填写的表格太多呈负相关(OR 0.5)、与上次乳房X光检查时的尴尬呈负相关(OR 0.6)以及与菲律宾种族/民族呈负相关。定期巴氏试验也发现了类似结果。
可及性和满意度是筛查的重要预测因素,但对解释种族/民族差异作用不大。需要采取针对性干预措施来改善多民族人群的定期乳房X光检查和巴氏试验筛查。