Brauner P
Forensic Biology Laboratory, Israel National Police Headquarters, Jerusalem.
J Forensic Sci. 1992 Jan;37(1):345-8.
This report concerns the rape of a woman by a stranger. The complainant stated that, during the course of the rape, penetration took place without ejaculation: these details were later confirmed by a suspect. This suspect, who was identified by the complainant, confessed and was convicted. Laboratory findings, however, indicated that the suspect could not have been the source of the semen found on the complainant's underpants. Further, a vaginal swab taken from the complainant contained intact sperm cells, an indication of a recent sexual contact. In spite of the presence of semen on the underwear which could not have come from the suspect, and the nonoccurrence of an ejaculation during the rape, the complainant maintained that she had not had a sexual contact for a month prior to the rape. This apparent contradiction and its implications are discussed.
本报告涉及一名女子遭陌生人强奸案。申诉人称,在强奸过程中,发生了插入但未射精的情况:这些细节后来得到了一名嫌疑人的证实。该嫌疑人经申诉人指认,供认不讳并被定罪。然而,实验室检测结果表明,嫌疑人不可能是在申诉人内裤上发现的精液来源。此外,从申诉人身上采集的阴道拭子含有完整的精子细胞,这表明最近有过性接触。尽管内裤上有精液但并非来自嫌疑人,且强奸过程中未射精,申诉人仍坚称在强奸发生前一个月内没有过性接触。本文将讨论这一明显的矛盾及其影响。