Santos Laurie R
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, USA.
Dev Sci. 2004 Apr;7(2):167-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00335.x.
Human toddlers demonstrate striking failures when searching for hidden objects that interact with other objects, yet successfully locate hidden objects that do not undergo mechanical interactions. This pattern hints at a developmental dissociation between contact-mechanical and spatiotemporal knowledge. Recent studies suggest that adult non-human primates may exhibit a similar dissociation. Here, I provide the first direct test of this dissociation using a search paradigm with adult rhesus monkeys. Subjects watched as a plum rolled behind one of two opaque barriers. In Experiment 1, subjects had to locate the plum based on the position of a wall that blocked the plum's trajectory. Subjects searched incorrectly, apparently neglecting information about the location of the wall. However, subjects searched correctly in Experiments 2-4 when they were given spatiotemporal information about the plum's movement. Results indicate that adult monkeys use spatiotemporal information, but not contact-mechanical information, to locate hidden objects. This dissociation between contact-mechanical and spatiotemporal knowledge is discussed in light of developmental theories of core knowledge and the literature on object-based attention in human adults.
人类幼儿在寻找与其他物体相互作用的隐藏物体时表现出明显的失败,但却能成功找到没有经历机械相互作用的隐藏物体。这种模式暗示了接触机械知识和时空知识之间的发展性分离。最近的研究表明,成年非人类灵长类动物可能也表现出类似的分离。在这里,我使用一种针对成年恒河猴的搜索范式,首次对这种分离进行了直接测试。实验对象观看一个李子滚到两个不透明障碍物中的一个后面。在实验1中,实验对象必须根据阻挡李子轨迹的墙壁位置来找到李子。实验对象搜索错误,显然忽略了关于墙壁位置的信息。然而,在实验2至4中,当给实验对象提供李子运动的时空信息时,他们搜索正确。结果表明,成年猴子利用时空信息而非接触机械信息来定位隐藏物体。结合核心知识的发展理论以及关于人类成年人基于物体的注意力的文献,对接触机械知识和时空知识之间的这种分离进行了讨论。