Bai Dawei, Strickland Brent
Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Institut Jean Nicod (ENS, EHESS, CNRS), PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Africa Business School and The School of Collective Intelligence, UM6P, Rabat, Morocco.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1782-1787. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02271-9. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
Physical objects behave following the principle of solidity: One solid object cannot pass through another. To what extent does the visual system integrate this physical regularity as a prior constraint? A new variant of the Pulfrich effect demonstrates a surprising degree of tolerance for violations of solidity when pitted against motion and depth cues. When adult participants view a pendulum swinging in the fronto-parallel plane with both eyes (one of which was covered by a light-attenuating filter), they falsely perceive the pendulum as swinging in an elliptical path (known as the "Pulfrich effect"). Here, we show that even when the pendulum's motion takes place entirely behind a solid horizontal bar, observers nevertheless see the pendulum pass through the bar while moving in an ellipse. This illusion suggests that the Pulfrich effect and the underlying stereoscopic depth cues can be robust to object solidity.
一个固体物体不能穿过另一个固体物体。视觉系统在多大程度上把这种物理规律整合为一种先验约束呢?普费弗希效应的一种新变体表明,当与运动和深度线索相冲突时,对于违反实体性的情况存在令人惊讶的容忍度。当成年参与者用双眼观看在额状平行平面内摆动的钟摆时(其中一只眼睛被一个减光滤镜遮住),他们会错误地将钟摆感知为沿椭圆形路径摆动(即“普费弗希效应”)。在此,我们表明,即使钟摆的运动完全发生在一根实心水平杆的后面,观察者仍然会看到钟摆在沿椭圆形运动时穿过了这根杆。这种错觉表明,普费弗希效应及潜在的立体深度线索对物体的实体性可能具有较强的抗性。