• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Violations of Core Knowledge Shape Early Learning.核心知识的违背会影响早期学习。
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;11(1):136-153. doi: 10.1111/tops.12389. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
2
Expectancy violations promote learning in young children.违背预期能促进幼儿的学习。
Cognition. 2017 Jun;163:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
How an infant's active response to structured experience supports perceptual-cognitive development.婴儿对结构化经验的积极反应如何支持感知认知发展。
Prog Brain Res. 2020;254:167-186. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
4
Should I learn from you? Seeing expectancy violations about action efficiency hinders social learning in infancy.我是否应该向你学习?看到关于动作效率的预期违背会阻碍婴儿期的社会学习。
Cognition. 2023 Jan;230:105293. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105293. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
5
Cognitive development. Observing the unexpected enhances infants' learning and exploration.认知发展。观察意外情况能增强婴儿的学习和探索能力。
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):91-4. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3799.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Prior probabilities modulate cortical surprise responses: A study of event-related potentials.先验概率调节皮层意外反应:一项关于事件相关电位的研究。
Brain Cogn. 2016 Jul;106:78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
8
Learning from non-representative instances: Children's sample and population predictions.从非代表性实例中学习:儿童的样本与总体预测。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Dec;152:335-342. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
9
Sensitivity to structure in action sequences: An infant event-related potential study.对动作序列结构的敏感性:一项婴儿事件相关电位研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Mar 18;126:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 6.
10
Young infants process prediction errors at the theta rhythm.婴幼儿在 theta 节律下处理预测误差。
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 1;236:118074. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118074. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Violations of physical and psychological expectations in the human adult brain.成人脑中身体和心理预期的违背。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Feb 1;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00068. eCollection 2024.
2
Core Moral Concepts and the Sense of Fairness in Human Infants.人类婴儿的核心道德观念与公平感
Hum Nat. 2025 Mar;36(1):121-142. doi: 10.1007/s12110-025-09490-0. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
3
Achievement emotions in kindergarten: the association of solution accuracy with discrete joy, sadness, and surprise.幼儿园中的成就情绪:解决问题的准确性与离散的喜悦、悲伤和惊讶之间的关联。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 13;15:1466345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1466345. eCollection 2024.
4
Predictions about reward outcomes in rhesus monkeys.预测猕猴的奖励结果。
Behav Neurosci. 2024 Feb;138(1):43-58. doi: 10.1037/bne0000573. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
5
Dogs' expectations about occlusion events: from expectancy violation to exploration.狗对遮挡事件的预期:从预期违背到探索。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Jul 26;290(2003):20230696. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0696. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
6
Not Playing by the Rules: Exploratory Play, Rational Action, and Efficient Search.不按规则行事:探索性游戏、理性行动与高效搜索
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Jun 15;7:294-317. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00076. eCollection 2023.
7
Seeing the Error in My "": A Quantified Degree of Belief Change Correlates with Children's Pupillary Surprise Responses Following Explicit Predictions.洞察我“”中的错误:明确预测后信念改变的量化程度与儿童瞳孔惊奇反应相关。
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;25(2):211. doi: 10.3390/e25020211.
8
Sampling statistics are like story creation: a network analysis of parent-toddler exploratory play.抽样统计就像故事创作一样:对亲子探索性游戏的网络分析。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210358. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0358. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
9
Preverbal infants expect agents exhibiting counterintuitive capacities to gain access to contested resources.未语婴儿期望具有反直觉能力的行为主体能够获得有争议的资源。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 25;11(1):10884. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89821-0.
10
Making Sense of the World: Infant Learning From a Predictive Processing Perspective.从预测加工视角看婴儿如何认识世界
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 May;15(3):562-571. doi: 10.1177/1745691619895071. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictable Events Enhance Word Learning in Toddlers.可预测事件增强幼儿的词汇学习。
Curr Biol. 2018 Sep 10;28(17):2787-2793.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
2
Infants preferentially approach and explore the unexpected.婴儿优先接近并探索意外事物。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2017 Nov;35(4):596-608. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12198. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
3
Expectancy violations promote learning in young children.违背预期能促进幼儿的学习。
Cognition. 2017 Jun;163:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
4
Infants anticipate probabilistic but not deterministic outcomes.婴儿能够预测概率性结果,但无法预测确定性结果。
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:227-236. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
5
Uncertainty and expectancy deviations require cortico-subcortical cooperation.不确定性和预期偏差需要皮质-皮质下合作。
Neuroimage. 2017 Jan 1;144(Pt A):23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.069. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
6
Neural dynamics of prediction and surprise in infants.婴儿预测与意外的神经动力学
Nat Commun. 2015 Oct 13;6:8537. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9537.
7
Why some surprises are more surprising than others: Surprise as a metacognitive sense of explanatory difficulty.为何有些惊喜比其他惊喜更令人惊讶:作为一种对解释难度的元认知感受的惊喜。
Cogn Psychol. 2015 Sep;81:74-116. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
8
Top-down modulation in the infant brain: Learning-induced expectations rapidly affect the sensory cortex at 6 months.婴儿大脑中的自上而下调节:学习诱导的期望在6个月时迅速影响感觉皮层。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 4;112(31):9585-90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510343112. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
9
Cognitive development. Observing the unexpected enhances infants' learning and exploration.认知发展。观察意外情况能增强婴儿的学习和探索能力。
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):91-4. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3799.
10
Preschoolers perform more informative experiments after observing theory-violating evidence.学龄前儿童在观察到违反理论的证据后会进行更多信息丰富的实验。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Mar;131:104-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

核心知识的违背会影响早期学习。

Violations of Core Knowledge Shape Early Learning.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The College of New Jersey.

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University.

出版信息

Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;11(1):136-153. doi: 10.1111/tops.12389. Epub 2018 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1111/tops.12389
PMID:30369059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6360129/
Abstract

Research on cognitive development has revealed that even the youngest minds detect and respond to events that adults find surprising. These surprise responses suggest that infants have a basic set of "core" expectations about the world that are shared with adults and other species. However, little work has asked what purpose these surprise responses serve. Here we discuss recent evidence that violations of core knowledge offer special opportunities for learning. Infants and young children make predictions about the world on the basis of their core knowledge of objects, quantities, and social entities. We argue that when these predictions fail to match the observed data, infants and children experience an enhanced drive to seek and retain new information. This impact of surprise on learning is not equipotent. Instead, it is directed to entities that are relevant to the surprise itself; this drive propels children-even infants-to form and test new hypotheses about surprising aspects of the world. We briefly consider similarities and differences between these recent findings with infants and children, on the one hand, and findings on prediction errors in humans and non-human animals, on the other. These comparisons raise open questions that require continued inquiry, but suggest that considering phenomena across species, ages, kinds of surprise, and types of learning will ultimately help to clarify how surprise shapes thought.

摘要

认知发展研究表明,即使是最年幼的婴儿也能察觉到并对成年人感到惊讶的事件做出反应。这些惊讶反应表明,婴儿对世界有一套基本的“核心”期望,这些期望与成年人和其他物种共享。然而,很少有研究探讨这些惊讶反应的目的是什么。本文讨论了最近的证据,表明违反核心知识为学习提供了特殊机会。婴儿和幼儿会根据对物体、数量和社会实体的核心知识来预测世界。我们认为,当这些预测与观察到的数据不匹配时,婴儿和幼儿会产生更强的动力去寻找和保留新信息。这种惊讶对学习的影响不是均等的。相反,它是针对与惊讶本身相关的实体的;这种动力促使儿童——甚至婴儿——形成并测试关于世界中令人惊讶的方面的新假设。我们简要考虑了这些最近的发现与婴儿和幼儿的相似之处和不同之处,一方面是与人类和非人类动物的预测误差的发现,另一方面是与人类和非人类动物的预测误差的发现。这些比较提出了需要进一步研究的开放性问题,但表明考虑跨物种、年龄、不同类型的惊讶和不同类型的学习的现象,最终将有助于阐明惊讶如何塑造思维。