Schlosser Ralf W, Blischak Doreen M
Department of Speech-Language Pathology & Audiology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Aug;47(4):848-62. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/063).
In this systematic replication of a previous study (R. W. Schlosser, D. M. Blischak, P. J. Belfiore, C. Bartley, and N. Barnett, 1998), the effects of speech and print feedback on spelling performance were evaluated. Four children with autism and no functional speech were taught to spell words with a speech-generating device under 3 feedback conditions. In the auditory-visual condition, children received both speech and print feedback, whereas in the auditory and visual conditions, only 1 type of feedback was provided. An adapted alternating treatments design was used. All 4 children reached criterion across conditions. Although 3 children reached criterion first with print or speech-print feedback, 1 child was most efficient with speech-print followed by speech feedback. Based on the findings of both studies, 2 distinct profiles of feedback efficiency are proposed. Children that exemplify the primarily visual profile spell words most efficiently when feedback involves print. Children that fit the auditory profile spell words most efficiently when feedback involves speech. The implications for understanding the learning characteristics of children with autism, as well as those for practice and further research are derived.
在对先前一项研究(R. W. 施洛瑟、D. M. 布利沙克、P. J. 贝尔菲奥里、C. 巴特利和N. 巴尼特,1998年)的这项系统复制研究中,评估了语音和打印反馈对拼写表现的影响。四名患有自闭症且无功能性言语的儿童在三种反馈条件下被教导使用语音生成设备拼写单词。在视听条件下,儿童同时接受语音和打印反馈,而在听觉和视觉条件下,仅提供一种类型的反馈。采用了一种改编的交替治疗设计。所有四名儿童在所有条件下均达到了标准。尽管三名儿童首先通过打印或语音 - 打印反馈达到标准,但一名儿童在语音 - 打印反馈后再接受语音反馈时效率最高。基于两项研究的结果,提出了两种不同的反馈效率概况。体现主要视觉概况的儿童在反馈涉及打印时拼写单词效率最高。符合听觉概况的儿童在反馈涉及语音时拼写单词效率最高。由此得出了对理解自闭症儿童学习特征的启示,以及对实践和进一步研究的启示。