Lacey Rachel Saul, Reifman Alan, Scott Jean Pearson, Harris Steven M, Fitzpatrick Jacki
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
J Sex Res. 2004 May;41(2):121-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490409552220.
Students at a southwestern university were surveyed to test the interrelations of three constructs: sexual-moral attitudes, love styles, and attraction criteria. Following the procedures of the National Health and Social Life Survey, from which the sexual-moral attitude items were obtained, we conducted a cluster analysis to create attitudinal groupings. We obtained four clusters representing various nuances of liberalism and conservatism. When compared on love styles, the clusters differed primarily on ludus and pragma. Not only did some of the liberal clusters differ from some of the conservative ones on love styles, but there were also some differences within liberalism and within conservatism. Cluster differences also emerged on the attraction criteria.
对一所西南大学的学生进行了调查，以测试三种构念之间的相互关系：性道德态度、恋爱风格和吸引力标准。按照《美国国家健康与社会生活调查》的程序（从中获取了性道德态度项目），我们进行了聚类分析以创建态度分组。我们得到了四个聚类，代表了自由主义和保守主义的各种细微差别。在恋爱风格方面进行比较时，这些聚类主要在游戏爱情和实用爱情方面存在差异。不仅一些自由主义聚类在恋爱风格上与一些保守主义聚类不同，而且在自由主义内部和保守主义内部也存在一些差异。在吸引力标准方面也出现了聚类差异。
