Hill Darryl B
College of Staten Island, City University of New York, Department of Psychology, 2800 Victory Blvd., Staten Island, NY 10314, USA.
J Sex Res. 2007 May;44(2):135-43. doi: 10.1080/00224490701263611.
In the last 10 years, researchers have developed separate rating scales for men and women that purport to measure a person's thoughts about their sexual self or sexual self-schema. While these scales are promising, there are some problems intrinsic to these measures. This study addresses these concerns and tests a combined measure for use among both men and women, while retaining internal consistency and a factor structure similar to the women's scale. Having both men and women complete the same scale permitted a comparison of how men and women think about their sexual selves. In this study, gender differences netted a small effect, with men scoring lower on both the loving/warmth and reserved/conservative factors compared to women. Results are discussed in terms of future research with this new scale and the meaning of gender differences along these dimensions.
在过去十年中，研究人员为男性和女性分别开发了评分量表，旨在衡量一个人对其性自我或性自我图式的看法。虽然这些量表很有前景，但这些测量方法存在一些内在问题。本研究解决了这些问题，并测试了一种适用于男性和女性的综合测量方法，同时保持内部一致性和与女性量表相似的因素结构。让男性和女性完成相同的量表，可以比较男性和女性如何看待自己的性自我。在这项研究中，性别差异产生了较小的影响，与女性相比，男性在爱/温暖和矜持/保守因素上的得分较低。本文将根据使用这种新量表的未来研究以及这些维度上性别差异的意义来讨论研究结果。
