Cherney D J R, Cherney J H, Chase L E
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Jul;87(7):2268-76. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)70047-8.
Perennial grasses are increasingly being used as an integral part of nutrient management plans, but fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) is often overlooked because of perceived intake problems. A 30-d study was conducted to evaluate the lactation performance of cows fed a fescue silage-based total mixed ration (TMR) compared with orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) silage-based TMR, when forages are harvested at recommended neutral detergent fiber (NDF) levels. Holstein cows (body weight [BW] = 627 +/- 66.0 kg, milk yield = 40.9 +/- 6.93 kg/d, parity = 2.6 +/- 1.44, days in milk = 152 +/- 24.5) were randomly assigned to treatment. Statistical design was a randomized complete block with 10 cows per treatment. The 5 treatments consisted of TMR using first-cutting alfalfa, and first- and second-cutting orchardgrass and tall fescue silage. Diets were formulated to provide 0.95% of BW as forage NDF and contained approximately 18% CP and 1.6 mcal/kg. This resulted in diets of about 30% NDF; for a 612-kg cow, approximately 5.8 kg/d of forage NDF was fed. Second-cutting, grass-based TMR had lower intake than alfalfa and first-cutting forage TMR. Cows consuming second-cutting orchardgrass had lower milk production than did cows consuming other forage TMR. Cows fed fescue TMR had higher milk production than those fed orchardgrass. Indigestible residues were higher, and NDF digestibilities were lower, in second-cutting forages vs. first-cutting forages, likely contributing to the differences observed in intake and resulting differences in milk production. Dairy cows consumed the first-cutting fescue TMR readily and performed as well as those on alfalfa or first-cutting, orchardgrass-based TMR in terms of lactation performance, but fescue and orchardgrass rations will require more concentrate in the ration than alfalfa.
多年生禾本科牧草越来越多地被用作养分管理计划的一个组成部分,但由于存在被认为的采食量问题,羊茅(高羊茅)常常被忽视。开展了一项为期30天的研究,以评估与饲喂基于果园草(鸭茅)和苜蓿青贮的全混合日粮(TMR)相比,饲喂基于羊茅青贮的TMR的奶牛的泌乳性能,此时牧草在推荐的中性洗涤纤维(NDF)水平下收获。荷斯坦奶牛(体重[BW]=627±66.0千克,产奶量=40.9±6.93千克/天,胎次=2.6±1.44,泌乳天数=152±24.5)被随机分配到各处理组。统计设计为随机完全区组设计,每个处理组有10头奶牛。5种处理包括使用头茬苜蓿、头茬和二茬果园草以及高羊茅青贮的TMR。日粮配方设计为提供占体重0.95%的饲草NDF,且含有约18%的粗蛋白和1.6兆卡/千克。这导致日粮约含30%的NDF;对于一头612千克的奶牛,大约每天饲喂5.8千克的饲草NDF。二茬禾本科牧草为基础的TMR采食量低于苜蓿和头茬牧草为基础的TMR。采食二茬果园草的奶牛产奶量低于采食其他饲草TMR的奶牛。饲喂羊茅TMR的奶牛产奶量高于饲喂果园草的奶牛。与头茬牧草相比,二茬牧草中不可消化残渣更高,NDF消化率更低,这可能是观察到的采食量差异以及由此导致的产奶量差异的原因。奶牛很乐意采食头茬羊茅TMR,就泌乳性能而言,其表现与采食苜蓿或头茬果园草为基础的TMR的奶牛一样好,但羊茅和果园草日粮在日粮中需要比苜蓿更多的精饲料。