• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超过药品福利上限且药品覆盖存在缺口的医疗保险受益人的成本降低策略。

Cost-lowering strategies used by medicare beneficiaries who exceed drug benefit caps and have a gap in drug coverage.

作者信息

Tseng Chien-Wen, Brook Robert H, Keeler Emmett, Steers W Neil, Mangione Carol M

机构信息

University of Hawaii Department of Family Practice and Community Health, Honolulu, and UCLA Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif.

出版信息

JAMA. 2004 Aug 25;292(8):952-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.8.952.

DOI:10.1001/jama.292.8.952
PMID:15328327
Abstract

CONTEXT

The majority of Medicare drug benefits in managed care (Medicare + Choice) have annual dollar limits or caps and many beneficiaries face temporary but potentially significant gaps in coverage after exceeding caps before the end of the year. In the new national Medicare drug benefit, beneficiaries with high medication expenditures will also face a period without drug coverage when their total drug costs exceed annual caps but are not high enough to qualify for catastrophic coverage.

OBJECTIVE

To describe strategies adopted by beneficiaries exceeding annual drug benefit caps to lower prescription costs, the type of medications involved, and their financial burden.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A survey (completed in 2002) of Medicare + Choice beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with high medication costs and benefits capped on the plan's share of drug costs (65% response rate). The different caps offered in different counties were used as a natural experiment. Study participants (n = 665) exceeded a 750 dollars or 1200 dollars yearly cap in 2001 and had coverage gaps of 75 to 180 days. Control participants (n = 643) had 2000 dollars caps, which they did not exceed. Study and control participants were matched by average total drug expenditures per month.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of beneficiaries reporting specific strategies to decrease medication costs, medications affected, and difficulty paying for prescriptions.

RESULTS

In multivariate analyses adjusting for demographic and health characteristics, a higher proportion of patients exceeding caps reported using less prescribed medication than controls (18% vs 10%, respectively; P<.001), but similar proportions reported stopping medications completely (8% for both, P =.86) and of not starting prescribed medications (6% vs 5%, P =.39). Patients exceeding caps more often called pharmacies to find the best price (46% vs 29%, P<.001), switched medications (15% vs 9%, P =.002), used samples (34% vs 27%, P =.006), and had difficulty paying for prescriptions (62% vs 37%, P<.001). Twelve of the 20 therapeutic classes most often affected by decreases in use of medication were for chronic health problems such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and emphysema or asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicare beneficiaries often decreased use of essential medications and experienced difficulty paying for prescriptions during gaps in coverage. Health professionals need to explore how they can lessen the impact of caps on patients' health and financial burden.

摘要

背景

管理式医疗(“医疗保险 + 选择”计划)中的大多数医疗保险药品福利都设有年度金额限制或上限,许多受益人在年底前超过上限后会面临暂时但可能很大的保险覆盖缺口。在新的全国医疗保险药品福利计划中,药物支出高的受益人在其总药费超过年度上限但又未高到符合灾难性保险覆盖标准时,也会面临一段时间无药品保险的情况。

目的

描述超过年度药品福利上限的受益人所采取的降低处方成本的策略、所涉及的药物类型及其经济负担。

设计、地点和参与者:一项于2002年完成的对65岁及以上、药物成本高且该计划的药品费用份额设有上限的“医疗保险 + 选择”受益人的调查(回复率为65%)。不同县提供的不同上限被用作一项自然实验。研究参与者(n = 665)在2001年超过了750美元或1200美元的年度上限,且有75至180天的保险覆盖缺口。对照参与者(n = 643)有2000美元的上限,且未超过该上限。研究参与者和对照参与者按每月平均总药费进行匹配。

主要结局指标

报告采取特定策略降低药费的受益人比例、受影响的药物以及支付处方费用的困难程度。

结果

在对人口统计学和健康特征进行调整的多变量分析中,超过上限的患者中报告减少处方药使用的比例高于对照组(分别为18%和10%;P <.001),但报告完全停药的比例相似(均为8%,P =.

86),未开始服用处方药的比例也相似(6%对5%,P =.39)。超过上限的患者更常打电话给药店以找到最优惠价格(46%对29%,P <.001)、更换药物(15%对9%,P =.002)、使用样品(34%对27%,P =.006),并且支付处方费用有困难(62%对37%,P <.001)。在因用药减少而受影响最频繁的20个治疗类别中,有12个是针对高血压、高脂血症、肺气肿或哮喘等慢性健康问题的。

结论

医疗保险受益人在保险覆盖缺口期间经常减少基本药物的使用,并在支付处方费用方面遇到困难。卫生专业人员需要探索如何减轻上限对患者健康和经济负担的影响。

相似文献

1
Cost-lowering strategies used by medicare beneficiaries who exceed drug benefit caps and have a gap in drug coverage.超过药品福利上限且药品覆盖存在缺口的医疗保险受益人的成本降低策略。
JAMA. 2004 Aug 25;292(8):952-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.8.952.
2
Impact of an annual dollar limit or "cap" on prescription drug benefits for Medicare patients.年度美元限额或“上限”对医疗保险患者处方药福利的影响。
JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):222-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.2.222.
3
Elderly patients' knowledge of drug benefit caps and communication with providers about exceeding caps.老年患者对药物福利上限的了解以及与医疗服务提供者就超过上限的情况进行的沟通。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 May;57(5):848-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02244.x.
4
Falling into the doughnut hole: drug spending among beneficiaries with end-stage renal disease under Medicare Part D plans.陷入“甜甜圈洞”:医疗保险D部分计划下终末期肾病受益人的药品支出
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Sep;17(9):2546-53. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005121385. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
5
PDP or MA-PD? Medicare part D enrollment decisions in CMS Region 25.PDP 还是 MA-PD?CMS 第 25 区的医疗保险部分 D 注册决策。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2010 Jun;6(2):130-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.04.002.
6
Medicare drug beneficiaries and cost-lowering strategies.医疗保险药品受益人和成本降低策略。
JAMA. 2005 Feb 2;293(5):552-3; author reply 553. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.5.552-b.
7
Medicare beneficiaries' knowledge of Part D prescription drug program benefits and responses to drug costs.医疗保险受益人对D部分处方药计划福利的了解以及对药品费用的反应。
JAMA. 2008 Apr 23;299(16):1929-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.16.1929.
8
Medicare beneficiaries' management of capped prescription benefits.医疗保险受益人的限额处方福利管理。
Med Care. 2001 Mar;39(3):296-301. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200103000-00009.
9
Gap in drug coverage often causes lapses in adherence to drug regimen, study shows.研究表明,药物覆盖范围的差距常常导致药物治疗方案的依从性出现中断。
Rep Med Guidel Outcomes Res. 2004 Sep 17;15(18):9-10, 12.
10
Prescription drug spending for Medicare+Choice beneficiaries in the last year of life.医疗保险+选择计划受益人的临终前一年处方药支出。
J Palliat Med. 2006 Aug;9(4):884-93. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.884.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying and Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Medication Adherence Among Marshallese Adults in Arkansas.识别并理解阿肯色州马绍尔群岛成年人药物依从性的障碍与促进因素。
J Pharm Technol. 2018 Oct;34(5):204-215. doi: 10.1177/8755122518786262. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
2
What is in your wallet? A cluster randomized trial of the effects of showing comparative patient out-of-pocket costs on primary care prescribing for uncomplicated hypertension.你的钱包里有什么?一项比较患者自付费用对初级保健治疗单纯性高血压处方影响的整群随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0701-x.
3
Physician Perception of Patient Medication Adherence in a Cohort of Medicare Advantage Plans in Texas.
德克萨斯州医疗保险优势计划队列中医生对患者药物依从性的认知
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Mar;22(3):305-12. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.3.305.
4
What Strategies Do Physicians and Patients Discuss to Reduce Out-of-Pocket Costs? Analysis of Cost-Saving Strategies in 1,755 Outpatient Clinic Visits.医生和患者会讨论哪些策略来降低自付费用?对1755次门诊就诊中的成本节约策略进行分析。
Med Decis Making. 2016 Oct;36(7):900-10. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15626384. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
5
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational use of medicines.药品政策:封顶价和共付额对合理用药的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 8;2015(5):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.pub2.
6
Did Medicare Part D reduce disparities?医疗保险D部分是否减少了差异?
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Feb;21(2):119-28.
7
Sensitivity of medication use to formulary controls in medicare beneficiaries: a review of the literature.医疗保险受益人用药对药品目录控制的敏感性:文献综述
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2011 Nov;4(7):465-74.
8
Digesting the doughnut hole.消除“甜甜圈漏洞”。
J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;32(6):1345-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 6.
9
Cost sharing and decreased branded oral anti-diabetic medication adherence among elderly Part D Medicare beneficiaries.老年医疗保险计划 D 受益人中自付费用增加和品牌口服抗糖尿病药物依从性降低。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):876-85. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2342-3. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
10
Association of teriparatide adherence and persistence with clinical and economic outcomes in Medicare Part D recipients: a retrospective cohort study.特立帕肽依从性和持久性与医疗保险部分 D 受者临床和经济结局的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jan 3;14:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-4.