Rouzier Roman, Mathieu Marie-Christine, Sideris Lucas, Youmsi Esther, Rajan Radhika, Garbay Jean-Rémi, André Fabrice, Marsiglia Hugo, Spielmann Marc, Delaloge Suzette
Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Cancer. 2004 Sep 1;101(5):918-25. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20491.
Randomized trials comparing neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy show that primary chemotherapy allows more frequent breast-preserving surgery even though no survival advantage has been demonstrated. The aim of the current study was to determine the predicting factors and the survival impact of breast conservation in patients with large breast tumors treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Between January 1987 and December 2001, 594 patients with invasive T2-3 breast carcinoma who were ineligible for breast-conserving surgery (the mean initial tumor diameter was 49 mm) were treated with 3 or 4 courses of an anthracycline-based primary chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. Various clinicopathologic factors were tested as possible predicting factors of breast-preserving surgery. Survival analyses were performed to determine the implications of breast-conserving surgery on outcome.
After primary chemotherapy, 287 (48%) patients were eligible for breast-conserving surgery and 307 patients underwent a mastectomy. Initial tumor diameter > 5 cm, low histologic grade, lobular histology, and multicentricity were independent predicting factors of breast conservation ineligibility in the multivariate analysis (logistic regression). In the univariate survival analysis, a failure of breast-preserving surgery was associated with a poor outcome. Local disease recurrence-free survival rates were similar in patients treated with lumpectomy and mastectomy.
The results reported in the current study suggested that initial diameter, histologic type and grade, and multicentricity are potential prechemotherapy predicting factors of breast conservation. When carefully selected, patients treated with breast conservation had a risk of local disease recurrence similar to the risk of chest wall disease recurrence after mastectomy.
比较新辅助化疗与辅助化疗的随机试验表明,尽管尚未证明新辅助化疗有生存优势,但原发性化疗能使保乳手术的实施更为频繁。本研究的目的是确定接受新辅助化疗的大乳腺肿瘤患者保乳的预测因素及其对生存的影响。
1987年1月至2001年12月期间,594例不符合保乳手术条件(初始肿瘤平均直径为49mm)的浸润性T2-3期乳腺癌患者接受了3或4个疗程的蒽环类原发性化疗、手术及放疗。对各种临床病理因素进行检测,以确定其作为保乳手术可能预测因素的可能性。进行生存分析以确定保乳手术对预后的影响。
原发性化疗后,287例(48%)患者符合保乳手术条件,307例患者接受了乳房切除术。在多变量分析(逻辑回归)中,初始肿瘤直径>5cm、低组织学分级、小叶组织学及多中心性是保乳不合宜的独立预测因素。在单变量生存分析中,保乳手术失败与预后不良相关。接受肿块切除术和乳房切除术的患者局部无病生存率相似。
本研究报告的结果表明,初始直径、组织学类型和分级以及多中心性是化疗前保乳的潜在预测因素。经过仔细选择,接受保乳治疗的患者局部疾病复发风险与乳房切除术后胸壁疾病复发风险相似。