• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估伊朗伊斯兰共和国设拉子避孕方法的成本效益。

Assessing the cost-effectiveness of contraceptive methods in Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran.

作者信息

Nakhaee N, Mirahmadizadeh A R, Gorji H A, Mohammadi M

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Islamic Republic of Iran.

出版信息

East Mediterr Health J. 2002 Jan;8(1):55-63.

PMID:15330561
Abstract

To determine the cost-effectiveness of seven contraceptive methods from the providers' perspective, the cost per adjusted couple-years of protection (ACYP) was calculated for each method based on region-specific conversion factors. More than 74,800 ACYPs were provided during March 1999 to February 2000. Intrauterine devices and implants offered the highest and lowest ACYP respectively. Condom was the single most expensive contraceptive method. Vasectomy was the most cost-effective method and implant provided the highest cost per ACYP.

摘要

为从提供者的角度确定七种避孕方法的成本效益,根据特定区域的转换因子计算了每种方法的每调整夫妇保护年成本(ACYP)。1999年3月至2000年2月期间提供了超过74,800个ACYP。宫内节育器和植入物分别提供了最高和最低的ACYP。避孕套是最昂贵的单一避孕方法。输精管切除术是最具成本效益的方法,而植入物的每ACYP成本最高。

相似文献

1
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of contraceptive methods in Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran.评估伊朗伊斯兰共和国设拉子避孕方法的成本效益。
East Mediterr Health J. 2002 Jan;8(1):55-63.
2
Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel subdermal implants. Comparison with other contraceptive methods available in the United States.左炔诺孕酮皮下植入剂的成本效益。与美国现有的其他避孕方法比较。
J Reprod Med. 1994 Oct;39(10):791-8.
3
The costs of contraception.避孕的成本。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1983 Mar-Apr;15(2):70-2.
4
The cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in the UK: analysis based on a decision-analytic model developed for a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guideline.英国长效可逆避孕方法的成本效益:基于为英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)临床实践指南开发的决策分析模型的分析
Hum Reprod. 2008 Jun;23(6):1338-45. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den091. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
5
Prescribing a contraceptive method.
Nurse Pract. 1975 Nov-Dec;1(2):55-9.
6
The Model Family Planning Project in Isfahan, Iran.伊朗伊斯法罕的示范计划生育项目。
Stud Fam Plann. 1976 Nov;7(11):308-21.
7
[Contraception: methods, contraindications, surveillance].[避孕:方法、禁忌证、监测]
Rev Prat. 2000 Feb 15;50(4):451-60.
8
Postpartum family planning in private practice: a baseline study.
Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Nov;44(5):762-6.
9
Birth control update for childbirth educators.给分娩教育工作者的节育最新资讯。
Int J Childbirth Educ. 1992 Feb;7(1):28-30.
10
Contraception continuation rates and reasons for discontinuation in Zahedan, Islamic Republic of Iran.伊朗伊斯兰共和国扎黑丹的避孕措施持续率及停用原因
East Mediterr Health J. 2004 May;10(3):260-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of contraceptive methods from a health provider perspective: case study of Kiambu County Hospital, Kenya.从卫生服务提供者角度评估避孕方法的成本效益:肯尼亚基安布县医院案例研究。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jan 17;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01308-3.
2
Development of a pharmacoeconomic registry: an example using hormonal contraceptives.药物经济学登记册的开发:以激素避孕药为例。
Health Econ Rev. 2021 Mar 20;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00309-z.
3
Is contraceptive self-injection cost-effective compared to contraceptive injections from facility-based health workers? Evidence from Uganda.
与机构卫生工作者提供的避孕注射相比,避孕自我注射是否具有成本效益?来自乌干达的证据。
Contraception. 2018 Nov;98(5):396-404. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.07.137. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
4
Do economic evaluation studies inform effective healthcare resource allocation in Iran? A critical review of the literature.经济评估研究是否为伊朗有效的医疗资源分配提供了信息?文献综述。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2014 Jul 11;12:15. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-12-15. eCollection 2014.
5
Alternative strategies to reduce maternal mortality in India: a cost-effectiveness analysis.印度降低产妇死亡率的替代策略:成本效益分析。
PLoS Med. 2010 Apr 20;7(4):e1000264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000264.
6
Modelling cost-effectiveness of different vasectomy methods in India, Kenya, and Mexico.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2007 Jul 13;5:8. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-5-8.
7
Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries.发展中国家孕产妇和新生儿健康策略的成本效益分析
BMJ. 2005 Nov 12;331(7525):1107. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7525.1107.