Suppr超能文献

两种孕中期干预措施对增加母乳喂养的开始率和持续时间的影响:一项随机对照试验

Two mid-pregnancy interventions to increase the initiation and duration of breastfeeding: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Forster Della, McLachlan Helen, Lumley Judith, Beanland Christine, Waldenström Ulla, Amir Lisa

机构信息

Centre for the Study of Mothers' and Children's Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Birth. 2004 Sep;31(3):176-82. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00302.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite high levels of breastfeeding initiation in Australia, only 46 percent of women are still breastfeeding (exclusively or partially) 6 months later, with marked differences between social groups. This study aimed to determine the influence of mid-pregnancy breastfeeding education on the proportions of women breastfeeding at hospital discharge, and on the duration of breastfeeding.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial to compare two strategies for increasing the initiation and duration of breastfeeding was conducted, in which 981 primiparas who attended a public, tertiary women's hospital in Melbourne, Australia, were randomized to one of two interventions or to standard care (327 in each group). The interventions were a 1.5-hour class on practical aspects of breastfeeding using a previously tested tool (Practical Skills), and two 1-hour classes exploring family and community attitudes toward, and experiences of, breastfeeding (Attitudes). Both interventions took place in interactive small groups when women were in mid-pregnancy. Breastfeeding initiation was ascertained by interview 2 to 4 days after birth, and breastfeeding duration was assessed by telephone interview 6 months after birth.

RESULTS

Neither intervention increased breastfeeding initiation or duration compared with standard care. Rates at initiation were 97 percent (296/306) for the Practical Skills intervention, 95 percent (291/308) for the Attitudes intervention, and 96 percent (297/310) for standard care. Rates at 6 months were, respectively, 55 percent (162/297), 50 percent (146/293), and 54 percent (162/299).

CONCLUSIONS

In settings where breastfeeding initiation is already high, neither study intervention could be recommended as an effective strategy to increase breastfeeding initiation or duration.

摘要

背景

尽管澳大利亚的母乳喂养启动率很高,但6个月后仍只有46%的女性继续进行母乳喂养(完全或部分母乳喂养),不同社会群体之间存在显著差异。本研究旨在确定孕中期母乳喂养教育对女性出院时母乳喂养比例以及母乳喂养持续时间的影响。

方法

进行了一项随机对照试验,比较两种增加母乳喂养启动率和持续时间的策略,981名在澳大利亚墨尔本一家公立三级妇产医院就诊的初产妇被随机分为两种干预措施之一或接受标准护理(每组327人)。干预措施包括使用先前测试过的工具进行1.5小时的母乳喂养实践课程(实践技能),以及两节1小时的课程,探讨家庭和社区对母乳喂养的态度及经历(态度)。两种干预措施均在女性孕中期以互动小组的形式进行。通过产后2至4天的访谈确定母乳喂养启动情况,并在产后6个月通过电话访谈评估母乳喂养持续时间。

结果

与标准护理相比,两种干预措施均未提高母乳喂养启动率或持续时间。实践技能干预组的启动率为97%(296/306),态度干预组为95%(291/308),标准护理组为96%(297/310)。6个月时的比例分别为55%(162/297)、50%(146/293)和54%(162/299)。

结论

在母乳喂养启动率已经很高的情况下,两种研究干预措施都不能作为提高母乳喂养启动率或持续时间的有效策略推荐。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验