Bonuck Karen A, Trombley Michelle, Freeman Katherine, McKee Diane
Epidemiology and Population Health, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1413-26. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0435.
To determine whether an individualized, prenatal and postnatal, lactation consultant intervention resulted in increased cumulative intensity of breastfeeding up to 52 weeks.
The randomized, nonblinded, controlled trial recruited women from prenatal care. Baseline prenatal interviews covered demographic data and breastfeeding experience, intention, and knowledge. Interviews at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 months after birth collected data on weekly feeding patterns, infant illness, and infant health care use.
Two community health centers serving low-income, primarily Hispanic and/or black women.
The analytic sample included 304 women (intervention: n = 145; control: n = 159) with > or = 1 postnatal interview.
Study lactation consultants attempted 2 prenatal meetings, a postpartum hospital visit, and/or home visits and telephone calls. Control subjects received the standard of care.
Cumulative breastfeeding intensity at 13 and 52 weeks, based on self-reports of weekly feeding, on a 7-level scale.
The intervention group was more likely to breastfeed through week 20 (53.0% vs 39.3%). Exclusive breastfeeding rates were low and did not differ according to group. In multivariate analyses, control subjects had lower breastfeeding intensity at 13 weeks (odds ratio [OR]: 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-3.20) and 52 weeks (OR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.48-4.21). US-born control subjects had lowest breastfeeding intensity at 13 weeks (OR: 5.22; 95% CI: 2.43-11.22) and 52 weeks (OR: 5.25; 95% CI: 2.44-11.29). There were no significant differences in breastfeeding intensity among the US-born intervention, foreign-born intervention, and foreign-born control groups.
This "best-practices" intervention was effective in increasing breastfeeding duration and intensity. Breastfeeding promotion should focus on US-born women and exclusive breastfeeding.
确定产前和产后个体化的泌乳顾问干预措施是否能使母乳喂养的累积强度增加至52周。
这项随机、非盲法、对照试验从产前护理中招募女性。产前基线访谈涵盖人口统计学数据以及母乳喂养经历、意愿和知识。在出生后1、2、3、4、6、8、10和12个月进行访谈,收集每周喂养模式、婴儿疾病和婴儿医疗保健使用情况的数据。
为低收入、主要是西班牙裔和/或黑人女性服务的两个社区卫生中心。
分析样本包括304名有≥1次产后访谈的女性(干预组:n = 145;对照组:n = 159)。
研究泌乳顾问尝试进行2次产前会面、1次产后医院探访和/或家访及电话随访。对照组接受标准护理。
基于每周喂养情况的自我报告,采用7级量表评估13周和52周时的母乳喂养累积强度。
干预组在第20周时更有可能进行母乳喂养(53.0%对39.3%)。纯母乳喂养率较低,且两组间无差异。在多变量分析中,对照组在13周(优势比[OR]:1.90;95%置信区间[CI]:1.13 - 3.20)和52周(OR:2.50;95% CI:1.48 - 4.21)时的母乳喂养强度较低。在美国出生的对照组在13周(OR:5.22;95% CI:2.43 - 11.22)和52周(OR:5.25;95% CI:2.44 - 11.29)时的母乳喂养强度最低。在美国出生的干预组、在国外出生的干预组和在国外出生的对照组之间,母乳喂养强度无显著差异。
这种“最佳实践”干预措施在增加母乳喂养持续时间和强度方面是有效的。母乳喂养促进应关注在美国出生的女性和纯母乳喂养。