Peters Dana C, Ennis Daniel B, Rohatgi Pratik, Syed Mushabbar A, McVeigh Elliot R, Arai Andrew E
Cardiac MR Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Sep;20(3):411-6. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20145.
To develop and validate a three-dimensional (3D) single breath-hold, projection reconstruction (PR), balanced steady state free precession (SSFP) method for cardiac function evaluation against a two-dimensional (2D) multislice Fourier (Cartesian) transform (FT) SSFP method.
The 3D PR SSFP sequence used projections in the x-y plane and partitions in z, providing 70-80 msec temporal resolution and 1.7 x 1.7 x 8-10 mm in a 24-heartbeat breath hold. A total of 10 volunteers were imaged with both methods, and the measurements of global cardiac function were compared.
Mean signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for the blood and myocardium were 114 and 42 (2D) and 59 and 21 (3D). Bland-Altman analysis comparing the 2D and 3D ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) and end systolic volume (LVESV), and end diastolic myocardial mass (LVEDM) provided values of bias +/-2 SD of 0.6% +/- 7.7 % for LVEF, 5.9 mL +/- 20 mL for LVEDV, -2.8 mL +/- 12 mL for LVESV, and -0.61 g +/- 13 g for LVEDM. 3D interobserver variability was greater than 2D for LVEDM and LVESV.
In a single breath hold, the 3D PR method provides comparable information to the standard 2D FT method, which employs 10-12 breath holds.
开发并验证一种三维(3D)单次屏气投影重建(PR)平衡稳态自由进动(SSFP)方法,用于心脏功能评估,并与二维(2D)多层傅里叶(笛卡尔)变换(FT)SSFP方法进行对比。
3D PR SSFP序列在x - y平面使用投影,在z方向进行分区,在24次心跳屏气过程中提供70 - 80毫秒的时间分辨率以及1.7×1.7×8 - 10毫米的分辨率。共有10名志愿者接受了这两种方法的成像,并对整体心脏功能的测量结果进行了比较。
血液和心肌的平均信噪比(SNR)在2D方法中分别为114和42,在3D方法中分别为59和21。通过Bland - Altman分析比较2D和3D的射血分数(EF)、左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、收缩末期容积(LVESV)以及舒张末期心肌质量(LVEDM),得出LVEF的偏差±2 SD值为0.6%±7.7%,LVEDV为5.9毫升±20毫升,LVESV为 - 2.8毫升±12毫升,LVEDM为 - 0.61克±13克。LVEDM和LVESV的3D观察者间变异性大于2D。
在单次屏气过程中,3D PR方法提供的信息与采用10 - 12次屏气的标准2D FT方法相当。