Suppr超能文献

调整绩效指标以确保公平的计划比较。

Adjusting Performance Measures to Ensure Equitable Plan Comparisons.

作者信息

Zaslavsky Alan M, Zaborski Lawrence B, Ding Lin, Shaul James A, Cioffi Matthew J, Cleary Paul D

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Spring;22(3):109-126.

Abstract

When comparing health plans on scores from the Medicare Managed Care Consumer Assessment of Health Plans (MMC-CAHPS) survey, the results should be adjusted for patient characteristics, not under the control of health plans, that might affect survey results. We developed an adjustment model that uses self-reported measures of health status, age, education, and whether someone helped the respondent with the questionnaire. The associations of health and education with survey responses differed by HCFA administrative region. Consequently, we recommend that the case-mix model include regional interactions. Analyses of the impact of adjustment show that the adjustments were usually small but not negligible.

摘要

在根据医疗保险管理式医疗消费者健康计划评估(MMC-CAHPS)调查的得分比较健康计划时,应对那些可能影响调查结果、不受健康计划控制的患者特征进行结果调整。我们开发了一种调整模型,该模型使用自我报告的健康状况、年龄、教育程度以及是否有人协助受访者填写问卷等指标。健康状况和教育程度与调查回复之间的关联因医疗保健财务管理局(HCFA)行政区而异。因此,我们建议病例组合模型应纳入区域交互作用。对调整影响的分析表明,调整通常幅度较小,但并非微不足道。

相似文献

1
Adjusting Performance Measures to Ensure Equitable Plan Comparisons.
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Spring;22(3):109-126.
4
Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care.
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1744-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1744.
6
Language and regional differences in evaluations of Medicare managed care by Hispanics.
Health Serv Res. 2008 Apr;43(2):552-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00796.x.
8
Does the effect of respondent characteristics on consumer assessments vary across health plans?
Med Care Res Rev. 2000 Sep;57(3):379-94. doi: 10.1177/107755870005700307.
9
Understanding variations in Medicare Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems scores: California as an example.
Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;46(5):1646-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01279.x. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
10
Factors affecting response rates to the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study survey.
Med Care. 2002 Jun;40(6):485-99. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200206000-00006.

引用本文的文献

2
New Supplemental Benefits and Plan Ratings Among Medicare Advantage Enrollees.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2415058. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15058.
3
Learning from patients: The impact of using patients' narratives on patient experience scores.
Health Care Manage Rev. 2024;49(1):2-13. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000386.
4
Case-mix adjustment of patient-reported experience measures in National Regional Center for Pediatric.
Pediatr Res. 2023 Oct;94(4):1562-1569. doi: 10.1038/s41390-023-02488-3. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
5
How responding in Spanish affects CAHPS results.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 8;22(1):884. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08262-1.
6
Adjusting for Patient Characteristics to Compare Quality of Care Provided by Serious Illness Programs.
J Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;25(7):1041-1049. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0423. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
7
Medical Cannabis and Utilization of Nonhospice Palliative Care Services: Complements and Alternatives at End of Life.
Innov Aging. 2022 Jan 14;6(1):igab048. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igab048. eCollection 2022.
8
Association of Patient-Reported Physician Awareness of Complementary Medicine, Medical Care Experience and Care Quality.
J Patient Exp. 2021 Oct 27;8:23743735211049665. doi: 10.1177/23743735211049665. eCollection 2021.
9
Do patients' characteristics influence their healthcare concerns?-A hospital care survey.
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 14;16(10):e0258618. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258618. eCollection 2021.
10
Using Consistently Low Performance to Identify Low-Quality Physician Groups.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2117954. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17954.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex differences in assessments of the quality of Medicare managed care.
Womens Health Issues. 2000 Mar-Apr;10(2):70-9. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(99)00045-6.
2
Relationship of service satisfaction to life satisfaction and perceived well-being.
Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90016-2.
4
Relationships of patient satisfaction with experience of system performance and health status.
J Ambul Care Manage. 1995 Jan;18(1):73-83. doi: 10.1097/00004479-199501000-00008.
5
Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to explore.
Med Care Rev. 1993 Spring;50(1):49-79. doi: 10.1177/002570879305000104.
6
Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS22-31. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00003.
7
Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS). Foreword.
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS1-9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00001.
9
Why are sicker patients less satisfied with their medical care? Tests of two explanatory models.
Health Psychol. 1998 Jan;17(1):70-5. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.17.1.70.
10
Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status. Comparison with self-reports and observations of performance.
Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Sep 1;146(5):418-28. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009295.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验