Cellini M, Caramazza R, Bonsanto D, Bernabini B, Campos E C
University of Bologna, Department of Surgical Science 'A. Valsalva', Ophthalmology Service, Bologna, Italy.
Ophthalmologica. 2004 Sep-Oct;218(5):312-7. doi: 10.1159/000079472.
To study, with an objective method, inflammation of the anterior segment of the glaucomatous eye after treatment with latanoprost, travoprost and bimatoprost.
Sixty patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma aged between 38 and 76 years (mean 64.0 +/- 12.2) were randomly assigned to latanoprost 0.005, travoprost 0.004 and bimatoprost 0.03%. The study period lasted 6 months. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured every 2 weeks. We studied the intraocular inflammation before and after 3 and 6 months of therapy with an instrument composed of a He-Ne laser beam system, a photomultiplier mounted on a slitlamp microscope and a computer. This flare meter allows objective determination of the flare and the number of cells in the aqueous of the anterior chamber.
At the baseline, IOP was 26.4 +/- 3.6 mm Hg. After 3 months of treatment, mean IOP in the latanoprost group was 17.9 +/- 0.3 mm Hg (p < 0.001) with a mean cellularity of 12.638 +/- 3.284 photons/ms (p < 0.001). The travoprost group had an IOP of 17.2 +/- 0.3 mm Hg (p < 0.001) with a cellularity of 9.719 +/- 1.927 photons/ms (0.001). Finally, IOP in the bimatoprost group was 17.6 +/- 0.5 mm Hg (p < 0.001) with a cellularity of 6.138 +/- 1.475 photons/ms (p < 0.032). After 6 months of treatment, IOP in the latanoprost group was 18.1 +/- 0.3 (p < 0.001), in the travoprost group 17.3 +/- 0.3 (p < 0.001) and in the bimatoprost group 17.7 +/- 0.5 mm Hg (p < 0.001), whereas cellularity was 11.838 +/- 3.218 (p < 0.001), 8.950 +/- 3.692 (p < 0.001) and 7.617 +/- 2.603 photons/ms (p < 0.001), respectively. After 3 months, the travoprost (p < 0.013) and the bimatoprost groups (p < 0.001) had less flare compared with the latanoprost group and this remained so even at 6 months. When we compared the travoprost group with the bimatoprost group, we found significantly less flare at 3 months in the bimatoprost group (p < 0.001) but not at 6 months (p < 0.246).
The flare meter analysis shows that the eyes treated with bimatoprost and travoprost have a less significantly broken blood-aqueous barrier and their anterior chamber is also significantly less inflamed.
采用客观方法研究拉坦前列素、曲伏前列素和比马前列素治疗后青光眼眼前节的炎症情况。
60例年龄在38至76岁(平均64.0±12.2岁)的慢性开角型青光眼患者被随机分为使用0.005%拉坦前列素组、0.004%曲伏前列素组和0.03%比马前列素组。研究期持续6个月。每2周测量一次眼压(IOP)。我们使用由氦氖激光束系统、安装在裂隙灯显微镜上的光电倍增管和计算机组成的仪器,研究治疗3个月和6个月前后的眼内炎症。这种闪光光度计可客观测定前房房水中的闪光和细胞数量。
基线时,眼压为26.4±3.6 mmHg。治疗3个月后,拉坦前列素组平均眼压为17.9±0.3 mmHg(p<0.001),平均细胞密度为12.638±3.284光子/毫秒(p<0.001)。曲伏前列素组眼压为17.2±0.3 mmHg(p<0.001),细胞密度为9.719±1.927光子/毫秒(p<0.001)。最后,比马前列素组眼压为17.6±0.5 mmHg(p<0.001),细胞密度为6.138±1.475光子/毫秒(p<0.032)。治疗6个月后,拉坦前列素组眼压为18.1±0.3(p<0.001),曲伏前列素组为17.3±0.3(p<0.001),比马前列素组为17.7±0.5 mmHg(p<0.001),而细胞密度分别为11.838±3.218(p<0.001)、8.950±3.692(p<0.001)和7.617±2.603光子/毫秒(p<0.001)。3个月后,曲伏前列素组(p<0.013)和比马前列素组(p<0.001)与拉坦前列素组相比闪光更少,且6个月时依然如此。当我们比较曲伏前列素组和比马前列素组时,发现比马前列素组在3个月时闪光明显更少(p<0.001),但6个月时并非如此(p<0.246)。
闪光光度计分析表明,用比马前列素和曲伏前列素治疗的眼睛血-房水屏障破坏程度明显较小,且前房炎症也明显较轻。