Duriez Bart, Soenens Bart, Beyers Wim
Department of Psychology, K.U. Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
J Pers. 2004 Oct;72(5):877-910. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00284.x.
The relationship between the two main dimensions of the religiosity domain (Exclusion vs. Inclusion of Transcendence and Literal vs. Symbolic) and both the Five-Factor Model of personality and Berzonsky's (1990) identity styles was investigated in a Flemish sample of late adolescents (N = 335). The results show that, whereas Exclusion vs. Inclusion is unrelated to any of the personality dimensions, Literal vs. Symbolic was strongly related to Openness to Experience and moderately to Agreeableness. Further, it was shown that Exclusion vs. Inclusion was positively related to the normative identity style, and that Literal vs. Symbolic correlated positively with the informational identity style and negatively with the diffuse/avoidant identity style. As expected, the relation between Openness to Experience and Literal vs. Symbolic was fully mediated by the informational identity style. Once Openness to Experience was taken into account, Agreeableness was no longer an important determinant of Literal vs. Symbolic.
在一个弗拉芒语区青少年样本（N = 335）中，研究了宗教信仰领域的两个主要维度（超越性的排斥与包容以及字面与象征）与五因素人格模型和贝佐斯基（1990）的身份风格之间的关系。结果表明，虽然超越性的排斥与包容与任何人格维度均无关联，但字面与象征与经验开放性密切相关，与宜人性中度相关。此外，研究表明超越性的排斥与包容与规范性身份风格呈正相关，字面与象征与信息性身份风格呈正相关，与弥散/回避性身份风格呈负相关。正如预期的那样，经验开放性与字面与象征之间的关系完全由信息性身份风格介导。一旦考虑到经验开放性，宜人性就不再是字面与象征的重要决定因素。
