Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉疾病的床旁诊断:一项系统综述

Bedside diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review.

作者信息

Chun Andrea Akita, McGee Steven R

机构信息

Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle 98104-2499, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2004 Sep 1;117(5):334-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.03.021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of bedside findings for diagnosing coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed to retrieve articles published from January 1966 to January 2003 that were relevant to the bedside diagnosis of coronary disease in adults.

RESULTS

In patients with stable, intermittent chest pain, the most useful bedside predictors for a diagnosis of coronary disease were found to be the presence of typical angina (likelihood ratio [LR]=5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.2 to 7.8), serum cholesterol level >300 mg/dL (LR=4.0; 95% CI: 2.5 to 6.3), history of prior myocardial infarction (LR=3.8; 95% CI: 2.1 to 6.8), and age >70 years (LR=2.6; 95% CI: 1.8 to 4.0). Nonanginal chest pain (LR=0.1; 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.2), pain duration >30 minutes (LR=0.1; 95% CI: 0.0 to 0.9), and intermittent dysphagia (LR=0.2; 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.8) argued against a diagnosis of coronary disease. In patients with acute chest pain, the most important bedside predictors for a diagnosis of myocardial infarction were new ST elevation (LR=22; 95% CI: 16 to 30), new Q waves (LR=22; 95% CI: 7.6 to 62), and new ST depression (LR=4.5; 95% CI: 3.6 to 5.6). A normal electrocardiogram (LR=0.2; 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.3), chest wall tenderness (LR=0.3; 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.4), and pain that was pleuritic (LR=0.2; 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.3), sharp (LR=0.3; 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.5), or positional (LR=0.3; 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.5) argued against the diagnosis of myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of bedside predictors depends on the clinical setting. In the evaluation of stable, intermittent chest pain, a patient's description of pain was found to be the most important predictor of underlying coronary disease. In the evaluation of acute chest pain, the electrocardiogram was the most useful bedside predictor for a diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Aside from the extremes in cholesterol values, the analysis of traditional risk factors changed the probability of coronary disease or myocardial infarction very little or not at all.

摘要

目的

评估床旁检查结果对诊断冠状动脉疾病和急性心肌梗死的准确性。

方法

进行MEDLINE检索,以获取1966年1月至2003年1月发表的与成人冠状动脉疾病床旁诊断相关的文章。

结果

在有稳定、间歇性胸痛的患者中,发现对诊断冠状动脉疾病最有用的床旁预测因素为典型心绞痛的存在(似然比[LR]=5.8;95%置信区间[CI]:4.2至7.8)、血清胆固醇水平>300mg/dL(LR=4.0;95%CI:2.5至6.3)、既往心肌梗死病史(LR=3.8;95%CI:2.1至6.8)以及年龄>70岁(LR=2.6;95%CI:1.8至4.0)。非心绞痛性胸痛(LR=0.1;95%CI:0.1至0.2)、疼痛持续时间>30分钟(LR=0.1;95%CI:0.0至0.9)以及间歇性吞咽困难(LR=0.2;95%CI:0.1至0.8)不支持冠状动脉疾病的诊断。在有急性胸痛的患者中,对诊断心肌梗死最重要的床旁预测因素为新出现的ST段抬高(LR=22;95%CI:16至30)、新出现的Q波(LR=22;95%CI:7.6至62)以及新出现的ST段压低(LR=4.5;95%CI:3.6至5.6)。正常心电图(LR=0.2;95%CI:0.1至0.3)、胸壁压痛(LR=0.3;95%CI:0.2至0.4)以及胸膜炎性疼痛(LR=

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验