• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向高维生物学统计方法合理的认识论基础。

Towards sound epistemological foundations of statistical methods for high-dimensional biology.

作者信息

Mehta Tapan, Tanik Murat, Allison David B

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Section on Statistical Genetics, Ryals Public Health Building, Suite 327, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1665 University Boulevard, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA.

出版信息

Nat Genet. 2004 Sep;36(9):943-7. doi: 10.1038/ng1422.

DOI:10.1038/ng1422
PMID:15340433
Abstract

A sound epistemological foundation for biological inquiry comes, in part, from application of valid statistical procedures. This tenet is widely appreciated by scientists studying the new realm of high-dimensional biology, or 'omic' research, which involves multiplicity at unprecedented scales. Many papers aimed at the high-dimensional biology community describe the development or application of statistical techniques. The validity of many of these is questionable, and a shared understanding about the epistemological foundations of the statistical methods themselves seems to be lacking. Here we offer a framework in which the epistemological foundation of proposed statistical methods can be evaluated.

摘要

生物学探究的坚实认识论基础部分源于有效统计程序的应用。这一原则被研究高维生物学新领域或“组学”研究的科学家广泛认可,该领域涉及前所未有的规模的多样性。许多针对高维生物学领域的论文描述了统计技术的发展或应用。其中许多技术的有效性值得怀疑,而且似乎缺乏对统计方法本身认识论基础的共同理解。在此,我们提供一个框架,可用于评估所提出的统计方法的认识论基础。

相似文献

1
Towards sound epistemological foundations of statistical methods for high-dimensional biology.迈向高维生物学统计方法合理的认识论基础。
Nat Genet. 2004 Sep;36(9):943-7. doi: 10.1038/ng1422.
2
Epistemological issues in omics and high-dimensional biology: give the people what they want.组学与高维生物学中的认识论问题:满足人们的需求。
Physiol Genomics. 2006 Dec 13;28(1):24-32. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00095.2006. Epub 2006 Sep 12.
3
[Foundations of the new phylogenetics].[新系统发育学的基础]
Zh Obshch Biol. 2004 Jul-Aug;65(4):334-66.
4
Introductory guide to the statistics of molecular genetics.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;46(10):1042-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01523.x.
5
Biomarker discovery using high-dimensional lipid analysis.
Curr Opin Lipidol. 2007 Apr;18(2):181-6. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3280895d82.
6
Computational biology for cardiovascular biomarker discovery.用于心血管生物标志物发现的计算生物学
Brief Bioinform. 2009 Jul;10(4):367-77. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbp008. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
7
Towards a framework for establishing rigour in a discourse analysis of midwifery professionalisation.迈向在助产士专业化话语分析中建立严谨性的框架。
Nurs Inq. 2007 Mar;14(1):71-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2007.00352.x.
8
Influences on cognitive engagement: epistemological beliefs and need for closure.对认知参与的影响:认识论信念与认知闭合需求。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2006 Sep;76(Pt 3):535-51. doi: 10.1348/000709905X53138.
9
Medicine in the 21st century: towards a Darwinian medical epistemology.21世纪的医学:迈向达尔文式医学认识论。
P R Health Sci J. 2009 Dec;28(4):345-51.
10
Statistical methods.统计方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;65:136-47.

引用本文的文献

1
Crafted experiments to evaluate feature selection methods for single-cell RNA-seq data.精心设计实验以评估单细胞RNA测序数据的特征选择方法。
NAR Genom Bioinform. 2025 Mar 19;7(1):lqaf023. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqaf023. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Best practices for differential accessibility analysis in single-cell epigenomics.单细胞表观基因组学中差异可及性分析的最佳实践。
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 11;15(1):8805. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53089-5.
3
Challenges and best practices in omics benchmarking.组学基准测试中的挑战和最佳实践。
Nat Rev Genet. 2024 May;25(5):326-339. doi: 10.1038/s41576-023-00679-6. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
4
Differential Expression Analysis of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data: Current Statistical Approaches and Outstanding Challenges.单细胞RNA测序数据的差异表达分析:当前的统计方法与突出挑战
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jul 18;24(7):995. doi: 10.3390/e24070995.
5
Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression.单细胞差异表达中虚假发现的应对策略。
Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 28;12(1):5692. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25960-2.
6
Data-based RNA-seq simulations by binomial thinning.基于二项式稀疏化的基于数据的 RNA-seq 模拟。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 May 24;21(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3450-9.
7
Murine genetic models of obesity: type I error rates and the power of commonly used analyses as assessed by plasmode-based simulation.基于质粒模型的模拟评估肥胖的鼠类遗传模型:I 型错误率和常用分析方法的效能。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2020 Jun;44(6):1440-1449. doi: 10.1038/s41366-020-0554-2. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
8
Training in metabolomics research. I. Designing the experiment, collecting and extracting samples and generating metabolomics data.代谢组学研究培训。I. 设计实验、收集和提取样本以及生成代谢组学数据。
J Mass Spectrom. 2016 Jul;51(7):461-75. doi: 10.1002/jms.3782.
9
Inferential considerations for low-count RNA-seq transcripts: a case study on the dominant prairie grass Andropogon gerardii.低计数RNA测序转录本的推断考量:以优势草原草种糙毛须芒草为例的研究
BMC Genomics. 2016 Feb 27;17:140. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2442-7.
10
Assessing Dissimilarity Measures for Sample-Based Hierarchical Clustering of RNA Sequencing Data Using Plasmode Datasets.使用模拟数据集评估基于样本的RNA测序数据层次聚类的差异度量
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0132310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132310. eCollection 2015.