Cooke David J, Michie Christine, Hart Stephen D, Clark Daniel A
Douglas Inch Centre, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK.
J Pers Disord. 2004 Aug;18(4):337-57. doi: 10.1521/pedi.18.4.337.40347.
A survey of clinical views suggests that the significance of antisocial and socially deviant behavior in the diagnosis of psychopathic personality disorder is unclear. To investigate this issue, we evaluated Psychopathy Checklist-Revised ratings (PCL-R; Hare, 1991) using structural equation modeling. One model, referred to as the measurement model, included PCL-R ratings related to antisocial behavior as primary symptoms of psychopathy; a second, referred to as the causal model, included the same PCL-R ratings as secondary symptoms or consequences. Compared to the measurement models, the causal model included more PCL-R items, was more parsimonious, and had equal or superior fit indices. These findings suggest that antisocial behavior is best viewed as a secondary symptom or consequence of psychopathy, In addition, the findings have important implications for future research and clinical-forensic practice, especially concerning the assessment of risk for criminality and violence.
一项临床观点调查表明,反社会和社会越轨行为在精神病态人格障碍诊断中的重要性尚不清楚。为了研究这个问题,我们使用结构方程模型评估了《修订版精神病态量表》(PCL-R;黑尔,1991)评分。一个模型,称为测量模型,将与反社会行为相关的PCL-R评分作为精神病态的主要症状;另一个模型,称为因果模型,将相同的PCL-R评分作为次要症状或后果。与测量模型相比,因果模型包含更多的PCL-R项目,更简洁,并且具有相同或更好的拟合指数。这些发现表明,反社会行为最好被视为精神病态的次要症状或后果。此外,这些发现对未来的研究和临床法医实践具有重要意义,特别是在犯罪和暴力风险评估方面。