Köhler Denis, Boegel-Driessen Josephine Alexandra, Josupeit Jan, Issa-Keller Sarah-Joelle, Müller Romina, Stricker Johannes
Faculty for Social Sciences and Cultural Studies, University for Applied Sciences Düsseldorf, 40489 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 17;14(9):827. doi: 10.3390/bs14090827.
The structure of psychopathy is conceptualized differently in various models and no consensus has yet been reached. This study aimed to further clarify psychopathy's content and structure by validating the German Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality-Self-Report (CAPP-SR). For this purpose, we used a sample of = 458 participants. The CAPP's six factors were replicated in an exploratory factor analysis. Further confirmatory analysis revealed recommendations for optimizing the CAPP. Thus, both an optimized version and the original CAPP-SR were examined. The construct validity of both versions was then examined using a different self-rating instrument for psychopathy, the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure. The implications of the findings and further research directions are discussed.
在不同模型中,精神病态的结构被概念化为不同形式,尚未达成共识。本研究旨在通过验证德文版《精神病态人格综合评估-自我报告》(CAPP-SR)来进一步阐明精神病态的内容和结构。为此,我们使用了一个由458名参与者组成的样本。在探索性因素分析中重现了CAPP的六个因素。进一步的验证性分析揭示了优化CAPP的建议。因此,对优化版和原始版CAPP-SR都进行了检验。然后使用另一种精神病态自评工具——三元精神病态量表,来检验两个版本的结构效度。讨论了研究结果的意义和进一步的研究方向。