Kassebaum Denise K, Hendricson William D, Taft Thomas, Haden N Karl
University of Colorado School of Dentistry, 4100 E. Ninth Ave., Box C-284, Denver, CO 80262, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2004 Sep;68(9):914-31.
This study examined the current format of curricula at North American dental schools, determined curriculum evaluation strategies, and identified recently implemented changes as well as planned future innovations. The academic affairs deans of sixty-four North American dental schools received an email survey in August 2002; a second, follow-up survey was sent to nonresponders in February 2003. Online responses were collected and analyzed using SurveyTracker software. The final response rate was 87 percent, with forty-eight U.S. schools and eight Canadian schools responding. Respondents were asked to select descriptive statements about the general organization of their curricula and the degree to which problem-based learning (PBL), case-reinforced learning (CRL), curricular integration, and community-based clinical treatment experiences were incorporated. They were also requested to identify strategies employed to evaluate the curriculum and to report recently completed and desired future curriculum modifications. In regard to desired future curriculum innovations, respondents identified why they were considering curriculum changes and identified resources needed to implement the planned changes. Sixty-six percent of those who responded defined their current curriculum organization as primarily discipline-based with a few interdisciplinary courses. Nearly 60 percent of schools reported that they used PBL and CRL in specific courses or for components of certain courses, but only 5 percent of the respondents indicated that all of their courses used PBL. Regarding integration of major sections of the curriculum, only 7 percent reported that their entire curriculum was organized around themes of interrelated topics. Sixty-four percent reported that their curriculum had required community-based clinical treatment experiences for students. The most frequent innovations in the past three years were increased use of computer and web-based learning (86 percent), creation of patient care experiences early in the curriculum (84 percent), enhancement of competency evaluation methods (84 percent), and curriculum decompression (79 percent). These items plus increased community-based care were the most frequently identified future curricular innovations. There were virtually no differences between the responses of Canadian and U.S. dental schools. The results of this study help to broadly characterize dental curricula at North American dental institutions and identify curriculum modifications anticipated by the academic dean respondents.
本研究考察了北美牙科学院当前的课程设置形式,确定了课程评估策略,并找出了最近实施的变革以及计划中的未来创新举措。2002年8月,向64所北美牙科学院的学术事务院长发送了电子邮件调查问卷;2003年2月,又向未回复者发送了第二份跟进调查问卷。使用SurveyTracker软件收集并分析在线回复。最终回复率为87%,其中48所美国学校和8所加拿大学校做出了回复。受访者被要求选择关于其课程总体组织的描述性陈述,以及基于问题的学习(PBL)、病例强化学习(CRL)、课程整合和社区临床治疗经验的纳入程度。他们还被要求确定用于评估课程的策略,并报告最近完成的以及期望的未来课程修改情况。关于期望的未来课程创新,受访者指出了他们考虑课程变革的原因,并确定了实施计划变革所需的资源。66%做出回复的人将他们当前的课程组织定义为主要基于学科,只有少数跨学科课程。近60%的学校报告称,他们在特定课程或某些课程的组成部分中使用了PBL和CRL,但只有5%的受访者表示他们所有课程都使用了PBL。关于课程主要部分的整合,只有7%的人报告称他们的整个课程是围绕相关主题组织的。64%的人报告称他们的课程要求学生有基于社区的临床治疗经验。过去三年中最常见的创新是增加使用计算机和基于网络的学习(86%)、在课程早期创建患者护理经验(84%)、加强能力评估方法(84%)以及课程减负(79%)。这些项目加上增加基于社区的护理是最常被提及的未来课程创新。加拿大和美国牙科学院的回复几乎没有差异。本研究的结果有助于大致描述北美牙科学院的课程情况,并确定学术院长受访者预期的课程修改。