Kernick D P
St Thomas Health Centre, Exeter, England.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Oct;18(4):311-5. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018040-00001.
With the increasing emphasis on providing efficient and equitable services from primary care and against a background of increasing demands on limited resources, economic theory seeks to facilitate both the direction of primary care and the decisions that are made within it. This paper argues that the impact of health economics, particularly at the microeconomic level, has been limited. This is because health economists have failed to recognise the importance of context, and also reflects their attempts to force reality into a disciplinary matrix which is not always accessible and acceptable to end users. Argument is made for a closer relationship between health economists and those who commission and deliver primary care. It is also desirable to develop pragmatic decision-making frameworks which draw upon economic concepts and principles but reflect the realities of the environment in which they are applied.
随着对初级保健提供高效且公平服务的重视日益增加,且在资源有限但需求不断增长的背景下,经济理论旨在促进初级保健的发展方向以及其中所做出的决策。本文认为,健康经济学的影响,尤其是在微观经济层面,一直较为有限。这是因为健康经济学家未能认识到背景的重要性,也反映出他们试图将现实强行纳入一个最终用户并不总能理解和接受的学科框架之中。文中主张健康经济学家与初级保健的委托方和提供方建立更紧密的关系。还应制定务实的决策框架,这些框架借鉴经济概念和原则,但要反映其应用环境的实际情况。